Controversies in American Federalism and Public Policy

Herausgeber: Banks, Christopher P.

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This collection examines how the constitutional politics of federalism affects governments and citizens from a public policy standpoint. It addresses the impact that Supreme Court federalism precedents have in setting the parameters of national law and policies that the states are often bound to respect under constitutional law.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Routledge
• Seitenzahl: 214
• Erscheinungstermin: 16. März 2018
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 250mm x 175mm x 16mm
• Gewicht: 557g
• ISBN-13: 9781138036659
• ISBN-10: 113803665X
• Artikelnr.: 57174784

Autorenporträt

Christopher P. Banks, Kent State University, USA, combines his research and teaching interests by studying the political behavior of the judiciary, constitutional law, the judicial process and civil rights and liberties. He has published books and articles relating to judicial policy-making, federalism, the legal profession, the judicial process, human rights, American politics, terrorism, Bush v. Gore (2000), the politics of court reform and the judicial politics of the DC circuit.

Inhaltsangabe

1. The U.S. Supreme Court, New Federalism, and Public Policy; 2. The Right
to Keep and Bear Arms in the Roberts Court; 3. National Security and
Anti-Terrorism Policies: The Federalism Implications of Trump's Travel Ban;
4. Capital Punishment and Federalism: International Obligations and
Domestic Standards; 5. The Supreme Court and the Affordable Care Act: The
Consequences of the NFIB v. Sebelius decision for Health Care Policy; 6.
Federalism, Marriage Equality, and LGBT Rights; 7. The Legalization of
Marijuana and the Interplay of Federal and State Laws; 8. The Firm
Constitutional Foundation and Shaky Political Future of Environmental
Cooperative Federalism; 9. Immigration Federalism; 10. The Equal
Sovereignty Principle as Federalism Sub-Doctrine: A Reassessment of Shelby
County v. Holder; 11. Concluding Thoughts;