Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Covering the Courts]( "Covering the Courts")
Covering the Courts153,99 €![Observations On the Criminal Law of England: As It Relates to Capital Punishments, and On the Mode in Which It Is Administered]( "Observations On the Criminal Law of England: As It Relates to Capital Punishments, and On the Mode in Which It Is Administered")
Observations On the Criminal Law of England: As It Relates to Capital Punishments, and On the Mode in Which It Is Administered33,99 €![Regulation of Debt Collection in Europe]( "Regulation of Debt Collection in Europe")
Regulation of Debt Collection in Europe180,99 €![The Mazzel Ritual]( "The Mazzel Ritual")
The Mazzel Ritual122,99 €![The Costs of Tax Compliance;]( "The Costs of Tax Compliance;")
The Costs of Tax Compliance;30,99 €![Getting and Spending at the Professional Standard of Living; a Study of the Costs of Living an Academic Life]( "Getting and Spending at the Professional Standard of Living; a Study of the Costs of Living an Academic Life")
Getting and Spending at the Professional Standard of Living; a Study of the Costs of Living an Academic Life39,99 €![Tangled Web They Weave]( "Tangled Web They Weave")
Tangled Web They Weave18,99 €
Over the past century, tort law and insurance have developed deeply intertwined legal and economic roots. Insurance usually determines whether tort cases are brought to trial, whom plaintiffs sue, how much they claim, who provides the defense, how the case gets litigated, the dynamics of the settlement, and how much plaintiffs ultimately recover. But to what extent should liability rules be influenced by insurance? In this study, Mark Rahdert identifies the leading arguments both in favor of and against what he terms the "insurance rationale"--the idea that tort law should be structured to facilitate victim access to assured compensation. The insurance rationale has been a leading force in the development of product liability law and, as a component of accident compensation, has significantly influenced pro-plaintiff advances in principal areas of tort law. However, the insurance rationale is also the source of great controversy. Critics charge that liability rules deliberately set to maximize plaintiffs' access to insurance funds have corrupted the system, causing insurance costs to spiral upward uncontrollably. Considering the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the current debate, Rahdert develops a modified version of the insurance rationale that can become a tool for evaluating future tort reform proposals.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.