To study the consequences of the general principle of criminal liability of legal persons necessarily amounts to analyzing the cause and effect relationship between its consecration and the differences in the stakes and characters involved. But, beyond this relationship of cause and effect, it is above all a question of analyzing the differences in normative requirements that this principle imposes. It is therefore reasonable to ask whether the Cameroonian legislator has taken into account all the implications of codifying the criminal liability of legal persons. At the end of the analysis, it appears that the permit has only taken into account some of these consequences and has ignored others. It is regrettable that in its approach, it has limited itself to drawing the substantive consequences while completely ignoring the procedural implications.