Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Herausgeber: Davis, Fergal F.; De Londras, Fiona
Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Herausgeber: Davis, Fergal F.; De Londras, Fiona
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
An examination of the debates regarding whether judicial review is an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Anine KierulfJudicial Review in Norway113,99 €
- Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights159,99 €
- Jason Grant Allen (Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin)Non-Statutory Executive Powers and Judicial Review127,99 €
- Shai Dothan (University of Copenhagen)International Judicial Review47,99 €
- Theunis Roux (Sydney University of New South Wales)The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review51,99 €
- Robert Daniel RubinJudicial Review and American Conservatism74,99 €
- Katalin SulyokScience and Judicial Reasoning46,99 €
-
-
-
An examination of the debates regarding whether judicial review is an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 388
- Erscheinungstermin: 31. Mai 2016
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 21mm
- Gewicht: 568g
- ISBN-13: 9781107662964
- ISBN-10: 1107662966
- Artikelnr.: 45571063
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 388
- Erscheinungstermin: 31. Mai 2016
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 21mm
- Gewicht: 568g
- ISBN-13: 9781107662964
- ISBN-10: 1107662966
- Artikelnr.: 45571063
List of contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction. Counter-terrorism
judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras;
Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism
judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens
Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of
rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of
judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5.
Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of
counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary
scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an
empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial
and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial
Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced
constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism
rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world
counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised
Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial
review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian
C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court
of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement
of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for
counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen
Duffy; Index.
judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras;
Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism
judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens
Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of
rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of
judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5.
Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of
counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary
scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an
empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial
and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial
Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced
constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism
rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world
counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised
Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial
review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian
C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court
of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement
of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for
counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen
Duffy; Index.
List of contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction. Counter-terrorism
judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras;
Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism
judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens
Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of
rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of
judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5.
Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of
counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary
scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an
empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial
and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial
Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced
constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism
rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world
counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised
Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial
review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian
C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court
of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement
of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for
counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen
Duffy; Index.
judicial review: beyond dichotomies Fergal F. Davis and Fiona de Londras;
Part I. Judging Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 1. Counter-terrorism
judicial review as regulatory constitutionalism Fiona de Londras; 2.
Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary Jens
Elo Rytter; 3. When good cases go bad: unintended consequences of
rights-friendly judgments David Jenkins; 4. The rhetoric and reality of
judicial review of counter-terrorism actions: the United States experience
Jules Lobel; Part II. Beyond Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 5.
Emergency law as administrative law Mark Tushnet; 6. The politics of
counter-terrorism judicial review: creating effective parliamentary
scrutiny Fergal F. Davis; 7. Independent reviewers as alternative: an
empirical study from Australia and the United Kingdom Jessie Blackbourn; 8.
Public inquiries as an attempt to fill accountability gaps left by judicial
and legislative review Kent Roach; Part III. Counter-Terrorism Judicial
Review in the Political Constitution: 9. Rebalancing the unbalanced
constitution: juridification and national security in the United Kingdom
Roger Masterman; 10. Business as usual: deference in counter-terrorism
rights review Cora Chan; 11. Deference and dialogue in the real-world
counter-terrorism context Gavin Phillipson; Part IV. Internationalised
Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review: 12. Counter-terrorism law and judicial
review: the challenge for the Court of Justice of the European Union Cian
C. Murphy; 13. Post 9/11 UK counter-terrorism cases in the European Court
of Human Rights: a 'dialogic' approach to rights' protection or appeasement
of national authorities? Helen Fenwick; 14. Accountability for
counter-terrorism: challenges and potential in the role of the courts Helen
Duffy; Index.