Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Structuring U.S. Ground Forces to Meet all Threats]( "Structuring U.S. Ground Forces to Meet all Threats")
Structuring U.S. Ground Forces to Meet all Threats61,99 €![Can the Current Acquisition Process Meet Operational Needs?]( "Can the Current Acquisition Process Meet Operational Needs?")
Can the Current Acquisition Process Meet Operational Needs?60,99 €![Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie]( "Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie")
Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie60,99 €![American River Crossing Doctrine: A Look at Its Compatibility with Current Force Structure and the Modern Battlefield]( "American River Crossing Doctrine: A Look at Its Compatibility with Current Force Structure and the Modern Battlefield")
American River Crossing Doctrine: A Look at Its Compatibility with Current Force Structure and the Modern Battlefield60,99 €![Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca]( "Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca")
Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca61,99 €![U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition]( "U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition")
U.S. Stabilization and Reconstruction Doctrine: A Failure to Address the Specifics of Authoritarian Regime Transition60,99 €![The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base]( "The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base")
The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base61,99 €
The United States Air Force has transitioned to a CONUS based expeditionary force to reduce PERSTEMPO and offer greater flexibility in force projection options. However, with the end of the Cold War, reductions to our forward-deployed forces, and the emergence of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) threats, the USAF is left with the problem of protecting the Aerospace Expeditionary Force (AEF) in a deployed environment. Air Base Ground Defense (ABGD) has always been a key mission for aerospace forces. Throughout the history of military aviation, airfields and bases have been threatened with enemy attack in one form or another. USAF efforts to create a viable ABGD system have been a sporadic combination of episodic buildups and subsequent drawdowns of security force personnel and equipment. In essence, the Air Force has struggled with the concept of how to defend it's air bases for decades, from World War I to OPERATION ALLIED FORCE.