Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Legitimacy and Penetration in Stability Operations: Setting the Conditions for Perpetual Failure]( "Legitimacy and Penetration in Stability Operations: Setting the Conditions for Perpetual Failure")
Legitimacy and Penetration in Stability Operations: Setting the Conditions for Perpetual Failure60,99 €![Stability Operations: From the Post-Vietnam War Era to Today]( "Stability Operations: From the Post-Vietnam War Era to Today")
Stability Operations: From the Post-Vietnam War Era to Today60,99 €![Reframing Stability Operations: Using Social Science to Identify Pillars of Stability Operations to Bridge the Gap Between the Principles of Joint Ope]( "Reframing Stability Operations: Using Social Science to Identify Pillars of Stability Operations to Bridge the Gap Between the Principles of Joint Ope")
Reframing Stability Operations: Using Social Science to Identify Pillars of Stability Operations to Bridge the Gap Between the Principles of Joint Ope60,99 €![Role of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Stability Operations: Reality and Potential]( "Role of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Stability Operations: Reality and Potential")
Role of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in Stability Operations: Reality and Potential60,99 €![U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations: The Least-Worst Option to Fill the U.S. Capacity Gap]( "U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations: The Least-Worst Option to Fill the U.S. Capacity Gap")
U.S. Military Forces and Police Assistance in Stability Operations: The Least-Worst Option to Fill the U.S. Capacity Gap60,99 €![Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander]( "Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander")
Decisive Points in Stability and Support Operations: Current U.S. Army Doctrine Continues to Support the Tactical Commander60,99 €![Battle Staff Operations: Synchronization of Planning at Battalion and Brigade Level]( "Battle Staff Operations: Synchronization of Planning at Battalion and Brigade Level")
Battle Staff Operations: Synchronization of Planning at Battalion and Brigade Level60,99 €
This research examines the curriculum content for Stability Operations presented during academic year (AY) 2006 to 2007 at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff School (CGSS) as part of the Army's Intermediate Level Education (ILE). Methodology involved examination of all terminal and enabling learning objectives for the common core course and the advanced operations and warfighting course (AOWC). The research determined the number of learning objectives dedicated to stability operations and whether those learning objectives are linked to an assessment to determine competency levels for stability operations. This study challenges the assumption that the CGSS curriculum for stability operations is sufficient to produce mid-career officers who are competent in full spectrum operations (FSO). The study uses qualitative research methods to determine requirements, uncover gaps, and provide recommendations. Data have been collected from analysis of Army doctrine and in depth study of relevant academic works, government directives, professional articles, books, and occasional papers. The initial recommendation is to better focus the learning objectives dedicated to stability operations and to create assessment instruments capable of measuring competency for stability operations.