Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Lumumba's Independence Speech. Marking the Transition Towards a Free Africa]( "Lumumba's Independence Speech. Marking the Transition Towards a Free Africa")
Lumumba's Independence Speech. Marking the Transition Towards a Free Africa15,95 €![Make America Great Again. Does Populism Harm Transatlantic Relations?]( "Make America Great Again. Does Populism Harm Transatlantic Relations?")
Make America Great Again. Does Populism Harm Transatlantic Relations?16,95 €![Do No Harm. Wie Hilfe den Frieden unterstützt, oder den Krieg]( "Do No Harm. Wie Hilfe den Frieden unterstützt, oder den Krieg")
Do No Harm. Wie Hilfe den Frieden unterstützt, oder den Krieg17,95 €![The Harm of Algorithms. An Argumentative Analysis to Justify the Regulation of Algorithmic Recommender Systems]( "The Harm of Algorithms. An Argumentative Analysis to Justify the Regulation of Algorithmic Recommender Systems")
The Harm of Algorithms. An Argumentative Analysis to Justify the Regulation of Algorithmic Recommender Systems15,95 €![Critical Theory and World Politics]( "Critical Theory and World Politics")
Critical Theory and World Politics218,99 €![Critical Theory and World Politics]( "Critical Theory and World Politics")
Critical Theory and World Politics71,99 €![Political Correctness Does More Harm Than Good]( "Political Correctness Does More Harm Than Good")
Political Correctness Does More Harm Than Good31,99 €
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Public International Law and Human Rights, , course: HR-II, language: English, abstract: The problem emerges as a result of cartoons of Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H.) in 2005 by the Danish Newspaper "Jayllands Posten". It created a situation that exposed the differences of different worlds based on religions and beliefs. Freedom of expression and opinion in international instruments based on acknowledged human rights became controversial in relation to rights and duties. In regards to Danish cartoons, principles of harm and offence as explained by Mill and Feinberg and their legal validity are applied to judge the situation. Laws are based on norms and values philosophically exerted out of customs and practices. I would present that human behaviors are meant to be treated based on realities but not on cynic philosophical argumentations or debates.My purpose of research on the cartoons violence issue is to explain the moral grounds of universal human rights standards required to solve the dilemma peacefully. I have presented past, present and future of the controversy. All the conflict is misrepresented if they are presented out of context in relation to discussing the history of the conflict. For instance all the conflicts which are a threat to world peace have long history. And almost all the conflicts are based on religious grounds, for instance Palestine, Kashmir and the recent phenomenon terrorism is not out of this circle at all. My aim was to understand and give a brief but broad view of the cartoon controversy by describing its past as well. Describing religious conflict as the historical background does not mean we are still following the past but my aim was to show the current situation of our world which has become a global village in which personal bias of a single person can escalate a world conflict if few people decide to manipulate the situation. I certainly disprove any "clash of civilizations" but wanted to explain how we can build bridges among different cultural and social differences.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.