Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![You Have A Very Soft Voice, Susan]( "You Have A Very Soft Voice, Susan")
You Have A Very Soft Voice, Susan18,99 €![Einführung in die Strafverteidigung]( "Einführung in die Strafverteidigung")
Einführung in die Strafverteidigung29,80 €![Die Bedeutung des internationalen Soft Law der Vereinten Nationen und des Europarates für den deutschen Strafvollzug]( "Die Bedeutung des internationalen Soft Law der Vereinten Nationen und des Europarates für den deutschen Strafvollzug")
Die Bedeutung des internationalen Soft Law der Vereinten Nationen und des Europarates für den deutschen Strafvollzug149,00 €![Cyber Victimisation. The Cyber World and the Digital Dangers for Youths and Adolescents]( "Cyber Victimisation. The Cyber World and the Digital Dangers for Youths and Adolescents")
Cyber Victimisation. The Cyber World and the Digital Dangers for Youths and Adolescents42,95 €![The Effects of Community Policing on Crime Prevention in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria]( "The Effects of Community Policing on Crime Prevention in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria")
The Effects of Community Policing on Crime Prevention in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria47,95 €![A Review of Criminology and Victimization Theories and their Implications for Crime Control and Prevention within Societies]( "A Review of Criminology and Victimization Theories and their Implications for Crime Control and Prevention within Societies")
A Review of Criminology and Victimization Theories and their Implications for Crime Control and Prevention within Societies17,95 €![Criminal Justice. Dealing With Uncooperative Witnesses]( "Criminal Justice. Dealing With Uncooperative Witnesses")
Criminal Justice. Dealing With Uncooperative Witnesses15,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 1,7, Swansea University (College of Law), course: Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice, language: English, abstract: When it comes to sentencing offenders, the general public is quick to demand the highest possible sentencing available, and tends to focus on retaliation and public security rather than resettlement. Prison sentences are seen as the default solution for all kinds of offenders, and prison is often considered a place which best addresses the needs of both offenders and the general population. Yet, prisons are overcrowded, expensive and proven to produce high reoffending rates - and they are definitely not the best option everyone. Alternative models, such as community sentences, on the other hand, have a reputation of being too 'soft' on criminals, i.e. not meeting the public's expectations in terms of punitiveness, and its effectiveness is often doubted. Ratherthan interpreting 'soft on crime' in the sense of public perception, I will relate this to its effectiveness in terms of reoffending rates. In the following I would thus like to analyse in how far a decarcerative policy in respect of female offenders might help address the special needs of female offenders better and, thus, help stop them from reoffending. I will first focus on them make-up of the women's prison population, then turn to the situation of women in prison in order to tie this in with reoffending rates, and finally point out some ways to improve the current situation.