Lukasz Gruszczynski
Deference in International Courts and Tribunals
Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation
Herausgeber: Werner, Wouter
Lukasz Gruszczynski
Deference in International Courts and Tribunals
Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation
Herausgeber: Werner, Wouter
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
International courts use two key methodologies to determine the degree of deference granted to states in their implementation of international obligations: the standard of review and margin of appreciation. This book investigates how these doctrines are applied in international courts, analysing where their approaches converge and diverge.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Yuval ShanyThe Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals123,99 €
- Fabián RaimondoGeneral Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals184,99 €
- Farid AhmadovThe Right of Actio Popularis Before International Courts and Tribunals297,99 €
- Environmental Courts and Tribunals in Asia-Pacific257,99 €
- The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals130,99 €
- Challenges and Recusals of Judges and Arbitrators in International Courts and Tribunals241,99 €
- The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals145,99 €
-
-
-
International courts use two key methodologies to determine the degree of deference granted to states in their implementation of international obligations: the standard of review and margin of appreciation. This book investigates how these doctrines are applied in international courts, analysing where their approaches converge and diverge.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Oxford University Press (UK)
- Seitenzahl: 464
- Erscheinungstermin: 9. Dezember 2014
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 241mm x 162mm x 35mm
- Gewicht: 844g
- ISBN-13: 9780198716945
- ISBN-10: 019871694X
- Artikelnr.: 40579303
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
- Verlag: Oxford University Press (UK)
- Seitenzahl: 464
- Erscheinungstermin: 9. Dezember 2014
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 241mm x 162mm x 35mm
- Gewicht: 844g
- ISBN-13: 9780198716945
- ISBN-10: 019871694X
- Artikelnr.: 40579303
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- 06621 890
Lukasz Gruszczynski is Assistant Professor of International Law at the Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He is the author of Regulating Health and Environmental Risks Under WTO Law (OUP, 2010). Wouter Werner is Professor of Public International Law at the Free University of Amsterdam. He is a member of the Dutch Advisory Council on Public International Law, and is an editor of the Leiden Journal of International Law and the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law.
* 1: Lukasz Gruszczynski and Wouter Werner: Introduction
* Part I: General issues/comparative perspectives
* 2: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann: Judicial standards of review and
administration of justice in trade and investment law and
adjudication
* 3: Ilona Cheyne: Deference and the use of the public policy exception
in international courts
* 4: Benedikt Pirker: Democracy and distrust in international law: The
procedural democracy doctrine and the standard of review used by
international courts and tribunals
* 5: Andrei Mamolea: Good faith review
* Part II: International investment law and WTO law
* 6: Michael Ioannidis: Beyond the standard of review: Deference
criteria in WTO law and the case for procedural approach
* 7: Caroline Henckels: The role of the standard of review and the
importance of deference in investor-state arbitration
* 8: Erlend Leonhardsen: Treaty change, arbitral practice and the
search for a balance: Standards of review and the margin of
appreciation in international investment law
* 9: Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski: Standard of review and
scientific evidence in WTO law and international investment
arbitration: Converging parallels?
* Part III: European Union law
* 10: Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel: National procedural choices before the
Court of Justice of the European Union
* 11: Patrycja Dabrowska-Klosinska: Risk, precaution and scientific
complexity before the Court of Justice of the European Union
* 12: Alexia Herwig and Asja Serdarevic: Standard of review for
necessity and proportionality analysis in EU and WTO law: Why
differences in standards of review are legitimate?
* Part IV: International human rights law
* 13: Mónika Ambrus: 1. The European Court of Human Rights and
standards of proof: An evidential approach toward the margin of
appreciation
* 14: Uladzislau Belavusau: Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a
higher standard of proof in Strasbourg?
* 15: Veronika Bílková: The standard of equivalent protection as a
standard of review
* 16: Bernard Duhaime: Subsidiarity in the Americas: what room is there
for deference in the Inter-American System?
* Part V: Other international courts
* 17: Chiara Ragni: Standard of review and the margin of appreciation
before the International Court of Justice
* 18: Rosemary Rayfuse: Standard of review and the International
Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
* 19: Karolina Wierczynska: Deference in the International Criminal
Court practice concerning admissibility challenges lodged by States
* 20: Diane Bernard: Beyond hierarchy: Standards of review and
complementarity of the International Criminal Court
* Part I: General issues/comparative perspectives
* 2: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann: Judicial standards of review and
administration of justice in trade and investment law and
adjudication
* 3: Ilona Cheyne: Deference and the use of the public policy exception
in international courts
* 4: Benedikt Pirker: Democracy and distrust in international law: The
procedural democracy doctrine and the standard of review used by
international courts and tribunals
* 5: Andrei Mamolea: Good faith review
* Part II: International investment law and WTO law
* 6: Michael Ioannidis: Beyond the standard of review: Deference
criteria in WTO law and the case for procedural approach
* 7: Caroline Henckels: The role of the standard of review and the
importance of deference in investor-state arbitration
* 8: Erlend Leonhardsen: Treaty change, arbitral practice and the
search for a balance: Standards of review and the margin of
appreciation in international investment law
* 9: Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski: Standard of review and
scientific evidence in WTO law and international investment
arbitration: Converging parallels?
* Part III: European Union law
* 10: Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel: National procedural choices before the
Court of Justice of the European Union
* 11: Patrycja Dabrowska-Klosinska: Risk, precaution and scientific
complexity before the Court of Justice of the European Union
* 12: Alexia Herwig and Asja Serdarevic: Standard of review for
necessity and proportionality analysis in EU and WTO law: Why
differences in standards of review are legitimate?
* Part IV: International human rights law
* 13: Mónika Ambrus: 1. The European Court of Human Rights and
standards of proof: An evidential approach toward the margin of
appreciation
* 14: Uladzislau Belavusau: Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a
higher standard of proof in Strasbourg?
* 15: Veronika Bílková: The standard of equivalent protection as a
standard of review
* 16: Bernard Duhaime: Subsidiarity in the Americas: what room is there
for deference in the Inter-American System?
* Part V: Other international courts
* 17: Chiara Ragni: Standard of review and the margin of appreciation
before the International Court of Justice
* 18: Rosemary Rayfuse: Standard of review and the International
Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
* 19: Karolina Wierczynska: Deference in the International Criminal
Court practice concerning admissibility challenges lodged by States
* 20: Diane Bernard: Beyond hierarchy: Standards of review and
complementarity of the International Criminal Court
* 1: Lukasz Gruszczynski and Wouter Werner: Introduction
* Part I: General issues/comparative perspectives
* 2: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann: Judicial standards of review and
administration of justice in trade and investment law and
adjudication
* 3: Ilona Cheyne: Deference and the use of the public policy exception
in international courts
* 4: Benedikt Pirker: Democracy and distrust in international law: The
procedural democracy doctrine and the standard of review used by
international courts and tribunals
* 5: Andrei Mamolea: Good faith review
* Part II: International investment law and WTO law
* 6: Michael Ioannidis: Beyond the standard of review: Deference
criteria in WTO law and the case for procedural approach
* 7: Caroline Henckels: The role of the standard of review and the
importance of deference in investor-state arbitration
* 8: Erlend Leonhardsen: Treaty change, arbitral practice and the
search for a balance: Standards of review and the margin of
appreciation in international investment law
* 9: Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski: Standard of review and
scientific evidence in WTO law and international investment
arbitration: Converging parallels?
* Part III: European Union law
* 10: Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel: National procedural choices before the
Court of Justice of the European Union
* 11: Patrycja Dabrowska-Klosinska: Risk, precaution and scientific
complexity before the Court of Justice of the European Union
* 12: Alexia Herwig and Asja Serdarevic: Standard of review for
necessity and proportionality analysis in EU and WTO law: Why
differences in standards of review are legitimate?
* Part IV: International human rights law
* 13: Mónika Ambrus: 1. The European Court of Human Rights and
standards of proof: An evidential approach toward the margin of
appreciation
* 14: Uladzislau Belavusau: Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a
higher standard of proof in Strasbourg?
* 15: Veronika Bílková: The standard of equivalent protection as a
standard of review
* 16: Bernard Duhaime: Subsidiarity in the Americas: what room is there
for deference in the Inter-American System?
* Part V: Other international courts
* 17: Chiara Ragni: Standard of review and the margin of appreciation
before the International Court of Justice
* 18: Rosemary Rayfuse: Standard of review and the International
Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
* 19: Karolina Wierczynska: Deference in the International Criminal
Court practice concerning admissibility challenges lodged by States
* 20: Diane Bernard: Beyond hierarchy: Standards of review and
complementarity of the International Criminal Court
* Part I: General issues/comparative perspectives
* 2: Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann: Judicial standards of review and
administration of justice in trade and investment law and
adjudication
* 3: Ilona Cheyne: Deference and the use of the public policy exception
in international courts
* 4: Benedikt Pirker: Democracy and distrust in international law: The
procedural democracy doctrine and the standard of review used by
international courts and tribunals
* 5: Andrei Mamolea: Good faith review
* Part II: International investment law and WTO law
* 6: Michael Ioannidis: Beyond the standard of review: Deference
criteria in WTO law and the case for procedural approach
* 7: Caroline Henckels: The role of the standard of review and the
importance of deference in investor-state arbitration
* 8: Erlend Leonhardsen: Treaty change, arbitral practice and the
search for a balance: Standards of review and the margin of
appreciation in international investment law
* 9: Valentina Vadi and Lukasz Gruszczynski: Standard of review and
scientific evidence in WTO law and international investment
arbitration: Converging parallels?
* Part III: European Union law
* 10: Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel: National procedural choices before the
Court of Justice of the European Union
* 11: Patrycja Dabrowska-Klosinska: Risk, precaution and scientific
complexity before the Court of Justice of the European Union
* 12: Alexia Herwig and Asja Serdarevic: Standard of review for
necessity and proportionality analysis in EU and WTO law: Why
differences in standards of review are legitimate?
* Part IV: International human rights law
* 13: Mónika Ambrus: 1. The European Court of Human Rights and
standards of proof: An evidential approach toward the margin of
appreciation
* 14: Uladzislau Belavusau: Experts in hate speech cases: Towards a
higher standard of proof in Strasbourg?
* 15: Veronika Bílková: The standard of equivalent protection as a
standard of review
* 16: Bernard Duhaime: Subsidiarity in the Americas: what room is there
for deference in the Inter-American System?
* Part V: Other international courts
* 17: Chiara Ragni: Standard of review and the margin of appreciation
before the International Court of Justice
* 18: Rosemary Rayfuse: Standard of review and the International
Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
* 19: Karolina Wierczynska: Deference in the International Criminal
Court practice concerning admissibility challenges lodged by States
* 20: Diane Bernard: Beyond hierarchy: Standards of review and
complementarity of the International Criminal Court