Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Analysis of the Canadian Defense Ethics Program Decision-Making Guidance]( "Analysis of the Canadian Defense Ethics Program Decision-Making Guidance")
Analysis of the Canadian Defense Ethics Program Decision-Making Guidance63,99 €![The Shape of Victory: Alexander the Great and the Shaping of Strategic Effect]( "The Shape of Victory: Alexander the Great and the Shaping of Strategic Effect")
The Shape of Victory: Alexander the Great and the Shaping of Strategic Effect63,99 €![Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory: The Battle of Wake Island, 8-23 December 1941]( "Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory: The Battle of Wake Island, 8-23 December 1941")
Tactical Defeat or Strategic Victory: The Battle of Wake Island, 8-23 December 194164,99 €![Defining the Information Within Military Information Operations: Utilizing a Case Study of the Jammu and Kashmir Conflict]( "Defining the Information Within Military Information Operations: Utilizing a Case Study of the Jammu and Kashmir Conflict")
Defining the Information Within Military Information Operations: Utilizing a Case Study of the Jammu and Kashmir Conflict64,99 €![Disrupting Illicit Trafficking Networks: Defining the Dod's Role as Part of a Strategic Network Focused Strategy to Disrupt Illicit Trafficking Networ]( "Disrupting Illicit Trafficking Networks: Defining the Dod's Role as Part of a Strategic Network Focused Strategy to Disrupt Illicit Trafficking Networ")
Disrupting Illicit Trafficking Networks: Defining the Dod's Role as Part of a Strategic Network Focused Strategy to Disrupt Illicit Trafficking Networ64,99 €![The Impact of Strategic Guidance on Army Budget Submissions]( "The Impact of Strategic Guidance on Army Budget Submissions")
The Impact of Strategic Guidance on Army Budget Submissions64,99 €![Defining Doctrine for Transition, a Case Study in Post-MCO Security]( "Defining Doctrine for Transition, a Case Study in Post-MCO Security")
Defining Doctrine for Transition, a Case Study in Post-MCO Security63,99 €
The Persian Gulf War of 1990-1991 was widely hailed as a triumph of modern warfare. Those who remembered the trauma and inconclusiveness of Vietnam applauded its clear goals, lack of civilian interference, and decisive end. Yet, twelve years later, the U.S. invaded Iraq and embarked upon the high-risk, open-ended commitment that the first Bush administration had sought to avoid. This thesis examines U.S. civil-military relations and decision making regarding Iraq at three points between 1990 and 1998. Were those decisions consistent with legal, treaty, and moral obligations? Did the civilian policy makers provide military leaders with adequate guidance to make decisions and did the military provide the civilians with adequate options to formulate guidance? Finally, did the decision makers adequately revisit their decisions in order to adapt to changing situations? The U.S. political system constrained civilian decision makers within the law, but the desire for unambiguous and unchanging guidance caused civilian leaders to leave guidance unchanged in the face of changing political circumstances. Both military and civilian leaders generally discounted the unpredictable impact of military actions themselves on the strategic goals and therefore failed to adapt to changing situations.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.