Christopher F. Zurn
Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review
Christopher F. Zurn
Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Zurn examines the legitimacy of constitutional review using a normative theory of deliberative democratic constitutionalism.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- John Xiros CooperModernism and the Culture of Market Society41,99 €
- Paul M. LivingstonPhilosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness51,99 €
- David M. PapurtInside the Object Model85,99 €
- The IMF and Its Critics45,99 €
- David DooleyThe Social Costs of Underemployment41,99 €
- The Evolution of Population Biology64,99 €
- Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction65,99 €
-
-
-
Zurn examines the legitimacy of constitutional review using a normative theory of deliberative democratic constitutionalism.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 376
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Mai 2009
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 22mm
- Gewicht: 609g
- ISBN-13: 9780521119801
- ISBN-10: 0521119804
- Artikelnr.: 26571890
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 376
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Mai 2009
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 22mm
- Gewicht: 609g
- ISBN-13: 9780521119801
- ISBN-10: 0521119804
- Artikelnr.: 26571890
Part I. Introduction: 1. An old chestnut is actually two; 2. Pathologies of
ad hoc triangulation; 3. Functions and institutions; Part II. Majoritarian
Democracy and Minoritarian Constitutionalism: 4. Judicial review as
substantially legitimate protection of minority rights; 5. Judicial review
as procedurally legitimate protection of democracy; 6. Moving beyond
aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism; Part
III. From Majoritarian to Deliberative Theories of Constitutional
Democracy: 7. Deliberative democracy: four axes of analysis; 8.
Constitutionalism: four central elements; 9. Constitutional democracy?;
Part IV. Deliberative Democracy and Substantive Constitutionalism: 10.
Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism; 11. Guardians
of the moral law in the forum of principle; 12. Are substantialist defenses
of judicial review self-defeating?; Part V. Disagreement and the
Constitution of Democracy: 13. Democratic precommitment to judicial review:
Freeman; 14. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial
review: Waldron; 15. Upshot: we need a theory of democratic
constitutionalism; Part VI. The Seducements of Juristic Discourse as
Democratic Deliberation: 16. A division of labor between juristic
deliberation and populist aggregation?; 17. Actual juristic discourse in
the United States system of constitutional adjudication; 18. Legal
principles and moral-political reasoning; Part VII. Constitutionalism as
the Procedural Structuring of Deliberative Democracy: 19. A provisional
summary: criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review; 20.
Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas; Part VIII.
The Institutions of Constitutional Review I: Design Problems and Judicial
Review: 21. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional
review; 22. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review
system; Part IX. The Institutions of Constitutional Review II: Horizontal
Dispersal and Vertical Empowerment: 23. Self-review panels in the
legislature and regulatory agencies; 24. Mechanisms for inter-branch debate
and decisional dispersal; 25. Easing formal amendability requirements; 26.
Establishing civic constitutional fora.
ad hoc triangulation; 3. Functions and institutions; Part II. Majoritarian
Democracy and Minoritarian Constitutionalism: 4. Judicial review as
substantially legitimate protection of minority rights; 5. Judicial review
as procedurally legitimate protection of democracy; 6. Moving beyond
aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism; Part
III. From Majoritarian to Deliberative Theories of Constitutional
Democracy: 7. Deliberative democracy: four axes of analysis; 8.
Constitutionalism: four central elements; 9. Constitutional democracy?;
Part IV. Deliberative Democracy and Substantive Constitutionalism: 10.
Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism; 11. Guardians
of the moral law in the forum of principle; 12. Are substantialist defenses
of judicial review self-defeating?; Part V. Disagreement and the
Constitution of Democracy: 13. Democratic precommitment to judicial review:
Freeman; 14. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial
review: Waldron; 15. Upshot: we need a theory of democratic
constitutionalism; Part VI. The Seducements of Juristic Discourse as
Democratic Deliberation: 16. A division of labor between juristic
deliberation and populist aggregation?; 17. Actual juristic discourse in
the United States system of constitutional adjudication; 18. Legal
principles and moral-political reasoning; Part VII. Constitutionalism as
the Procedural Structuring of Deliberative Democracy: 19. A provisional
summary: criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review; 20.
Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas; Part VIII.
The Institutions of Constitutional Review I: Design Problems and Judicial
Review: 21. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional
review; 22. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review
system; Part IX. The Institutions of Constitutional Review II: Horizontal
Dispersal and Vertical Empowerment: 23. Self-review panels in the
legislature and regulatory agencies; 24. Mechanisms for inter-branch debate
and decisional dispersal; 25. Easing formal amendability requirements; 26.
Establishing civic constitutional fora.
Part I. Introduction: 1. An old chestnut is actually two; 2. Pathologies of
ad hoc triangulation; 3. Functions and institutions; Part II. Majoritarian
Democracy and Minoritarian Constitutionalism: 4. Judicial review as
substantially legitimate protection of minority rights; 5. Judicial review
as procedurally legitimate protection of democracy; 6. Moving beyond
aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism; Part
III. From Majoritarian to Deliberative Theories of Constitutional
Democracy: 7. Deliberative democracy: four axes of analysis; 8.
Constitutionalism: four central elements; 9. Constitutional democracy?;
Part IV. Deliberative Democracy and Substantive Constitutionalism: 10.
Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism; 11. Guardians
of the moral law in the forum of principle; 12. Are substantialist defenses
of judicial review self-defeating?; Part V. Disagreement and the
Constitution of Democracy: 13. Democratic precommitment to judicial review:
Freeman; 14. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial
review: Waldron; 15. Upshot: we need a theory of democratic
constitutionalism; Part VI. The Seducements of Juristic Discourse as
Democratic Deliberation: 16. A division of labor between juristic
deliberation and populist aggregation?; 17. Actual juristic discourse in
the United States system of constitutional adjudication; 18. Legal
principles and moral-political reasoning; Part VII. Constitutionalism as
the Procedural Structuring of Deliberative Democracy: 19. A provisional
summary: criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review; 20.
Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas; Part VIII.
The Institutions of Constitutional Review I: Design Problems and Judicial
Review: 21. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional
review; 22. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review
system; Part IX. The Institutions of Constitutional Review II: Horizontal
Dispersal and Vertical Empowerment: 23. Self-review panels in the
legislature and regulatory agencies; 24. Mechanisms for inter-branch debate
and decisional dispersal; 25. Easing formal amendability requirements; 26.
Establishing civic constitutional fora.
ad hoc triangulation; 3. Functions and institutions; Part II. Majoritarian
Democracy and Minoritarian Constitutionalism: 4. Judicial review as
substantially legitimate protection of minority rights; 5. Judicial review
as procedurally legitimate protection of democracy; 6. Moving beyond
aggregative majoritarianism and minoritarian constitutionalism; Part
III. From Majoritarian to Deliberative Theories of Constitutional
Democracy: 7. Deliberative democracy: four axes of analysis; 8.
Constitutionalism: four central elements; 9. Constitutional democracy?;
Part IV. Deliberative Democracy and Substantive Constitutionalism: 10.
Keepers of the substantive flame of American exceptionalism; 11. Guardians
of the moral law in the forum of principle; 12. Are substantialist defenses
of judicial review self-defeating?; Part V. Disagreement and the
Constitution of Democracy: 13. Democratic precommitment to judicial review:
Freeman; 14. Deliberative majoritarianism and the paternalism of judicial
review: Waldron; 15. Upshot: we need a theory of democratic
constitutionalism; Part VI. The Seducements of Juristic Discourse as
Democratic Deliberation: 16. A division of labor between juristic
deliberation and populist aggregation?; 17. Actual juristic discourse in
the United States system of constitutional adjudication; 18. Legal
principles and moral-political reasoning; Part VII. Constitutionalism as
the Procedural Structuring of Deliberative Democracy: 19. A provisional
summary: criteria for an adequate theory of constitutional review; 20.
Guardians of the conditions of procedural legitimacy: Habermas; Part VIII.
The Institutions of Constitutional Review I: Design Problems and Judicial
Review: 21. The problems of designing institutions of constitutional
review; 22. Independent constitutional courts in a concentrated review
system; Part IX. The Institutions of Constitutional Review II: Horizontal
Dispersal and Vertical Empowerment: 23. Self-review panels in the
legislature and regulatory agencies; 24. Mechanisms for inter-branch debate
and decisional dispersal; 25. Easing formal amendability requirements; 26.
Establishing civic constitutional fora.