Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice
A Comparative Perspective
Herausgeber: Barsotti, Vittoria; Cartabia, Marta; Carozza, Paolo G
Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice
A Comparative Perspective
Herausgeber: Barsotti, Vittoria; Cartabia, Marta; Carozza, Paolo G
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This collection adopts a distinctive method and structure to introduce the work of Italian constitutional law scholars into the Anglophone dialogue while also bringing a number of prominent non-Italian constitutional law scholars to study and write about constitutional justice in a global context.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Rule of Law, Common Values, and Illiberal Constitutionalism194,99 €
- Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts187,99 €
- Constitutional Change and Popular Sovereignty194,99 €
- The Constitutional Courts of Small Jurisdictions123,99 €
- Federalism and Constitutional Law194,99 €
- New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe182,99 €
- Constitutional Review in Central and Eastern Europe141,99 €
-
-
-
This collection adopts a distinctive method and structure to introduce the work of Italian constitutional law scholars into the Anglophone dialogue while also bringing a number of prominent non-Italian constitutional law scholars to study and write about constitutional justice in a global context.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 27. April 2021
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 603g
- ISBN-13: 9780367507459
- ISBN-10: 0367507455
- Artikelnr.: 60016529
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 27. April 2021
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 18mm
- Gewicht: 603g
- ISBN-13: 9780367507459
- ISBN-10: 0367507455
- Artikelnr.: 60016529
Vittoria Barsotti, Professor of Comparative Law, University of Florence, Italy; Paolo G. Carozza, Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School, USA; Marta Cartabia, Vice President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Italy; Andrea Simoncini, Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Florence, Italy;
Introduction; 2. Dialogue as Method, Vittoria Barsotti, Paolo G. Carozza,
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Introduction; 2. Dialogue as Method, Vittoria Barsotti, Paolo G. Carozza,
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;