Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Confronting the Machine]( "Confronting the Machine")
Confronting the Machine40,99 €![Art of the 1980s]( "Art of the 1980s")
Art of the 1980s89,00 €![NFT related art and the concept of the artist in a historical perspective]( "NFT related art and the concept of the artist in a historical perspective")
NFT related art and the concept of the artist in a historical perspective18,95 €![The Sculptural in the (Post-)Digital Age]( "The Sculptural in the (Post-)Digital Age")
The Sculptural in the (Post-)Digital Age59,95 €![Posthumane Männlichkeiten]( "Posthumane Männlichkeiten")
Posthumane Männlichkeiten79,00 €![Aspects of emptiness in contemporary art]( "Aspects of emptiness in contemporary art")
Aspects of emptiness in contemporary art32,99 €![Sketches of the history of art in Mexico]( "Sketches of the history of art in Mexico")
Sketches of the history of art in Mexico64,99 €
Mankind has probably never been so prolific in the artistic field as in our time. Our time has witnessed the appearance of new words and popular concepts that are in vogue and very fashionable: Cyberart, digital works, multimedia art, etc.. Many artists will claim the status of digital works, for their productions and make this new space their specific field of expression. In addition, a new category of individuals constituted of Webmasters, Computer Graphics, Designers, claims the status of digital artists. And it is in this context that the problem of digital artistic creation arises. Faced with all this, the need for a specialized lighting is felt. Does digital art deserve a place among all movements and art forms in the great artistic classifications? Or is there an ontological or non-ontological reason why digital creations cannot be recognized as truly artistic? Is digital art an art in its own right or an art entirely apart?