In this work, Carol V.A. Quinn considers survivors' arguments in the debate concerning the ethics of using Nazi medical data, showing what it would mean to take their claims seriously. Her approach is interdisciplinary, incorporating philosophy, psychology, trauma research, survivors' testimony, Holocaust poetry, literature, and the Hebrew Bible.
In this work, Carol V.A. Quinn considers survivors' arguments in the debate concerning the ethics of using Nazi medical data, showing what it would mean to take their claims seriously. Her approach is interdisciplinary, incorporating philosophy, psychology, trauma research, survivors' testimony, Holocaust poetry, literature, and the Hebrew Bible.
Preface Introduction Chapter 1: An Overview of the Debate Chapter 2: Kant's Conception of Dignity and How it Fails to Capture Survivors' Claims of Harm Chapter 3: On Finding an Adequate Conception of Dignity Chapter 4: Trauma, the Self, and Controlling the Nazi Data Chapter 5: Nazi Data: Transparent, Evil, and Transparently Evil Chapter 6: Epistemic Injustice and the Survivors' Claims to Moral Expertise Bibliography
Preface Introduction Chapter 1: An Overview of the Debate Chapter 2: Kant's Conception of Dignity and How it Fails to Capture Survivors' Claims of Harm Chapter 3: On Finding an Adequate Conception of Dignity Chapter 4: Trauma, the Self, and Controlling the Nazi Data Chapter 5: Nazi Data: Transparent, Evil, and Transparently Evil Chapter 6: Epistemic Injustice and the Survivors' Claims to Moral Expertise Bibliography
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309