Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Parallel Power Electronics Filters in Three-Phase Four-Wire Systems]( "Parallel Power Electronics Filters in Three-Phase Four-Wire Systems")
Parallel Power Electronics Filters in Three-Phase Four-Wire Systems37,99 €![Cross Platforms Display Calibration and Profiling]( "Cross Platforms Display Calibration and Profiling")
Cross Platforms Display Calibration and Profiling51,99 €![A 2D SWITCHED RELUCTANCE PLANAR MOTOR]( "A 2D SWITCHED RELUCTANCE PLANAR MOTOR")
A 2D SWITCHED RELUCTANCE PLANAR MOTOR44,99 €![Dynamics of Planar Multibody Systems]( "Dynamics of Planar Multibody Systems")
Dynamics of Planar Multibody Systems32,99 €![Three Dimensional Dynamics of the Golf Swing]( "Three Dimensional Dynamics of the Golf Swing")
Three Dimensional Dynamics of the Golf Swing44,99 €![Development and Assessment of Regeneration Methods for Commercial Automotive Three-Way Catalysts]( "Development and Assessment of Regeneration Methods for Commercial Automotive Three-Way Catalysts")
Development and Assessment of Regeneration Methods for Commercial Automotive Three-Way Catalysts32,99 €![Direct Observation of High-Temperature Phase transformations in Steel]( "Direct Observation of High-Temperature Phase transformations in Steel")
Direct Observation of High-Temperature Phase transformations in Steel32,99 €
Kinematic mapping is a valuable tool to deal with
difficult direct kinematics problems. It should have
successful application in other areas of kinematics
as well. However, it has been ignored by most
engineers. One reason may be that it is rooted in
19th century projective geometry, while most
engineers are familiar only with the older,
traditional Euclidean geometry. Hence, many
reject kinematic mapping at the first glance when
confronted by its peculiar, sometimes intuitively
unrealistic, possibly confusing and overly
complicated concepts. It is humbly suggested
that we might initially avoid the details of the
basic geometry in order not to scare off potential
users when introducing them to kinematic mapping.
The authors found this tool to be easy to use
but difficult to understand. Therefore, it may
obtain wider acceptance if we focus first on actual
applications before becoming enmeshed deeply in the
theoretical background.
difficult direct kinematics problems. It should have
successful application in other areas of kinematics
as well. However, it has been ignored by most
engineers. One reason may be that it is rooted in
19th century projective geometry, while most
engineers are familiar only with the older,
traditional Euclidean geometry. Hence, many
reject kinematic mapping at the first glance when
confronted by its peculiar, sometimes intuitively
unrealistic, possibly confusing and overly
complicated concepts. It is humbly suggested
that we might initially avoid the details of the
basic geometry in order not to scare off potential
users when introducing them to kinematic mapping.
The authors found this tool to be easy to use
but difficult to understand. Therefore, it may
obtain wider acceptance if we focus first on actual
applications before becoming enmeshed deeply in the
theoretical background.