Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Judge and jury]( "Judge and jury")
Judge and jury30,90 €![Ancient DNA in Physical Anthropology]( "Ancient DNA in Physical Anthropology")
Ancient DNA in Physical Anthropology32,99 €![The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum]( "The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum")
The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum21,90 €![The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum]( "The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum")
The Judge Advocate's Vade Mecum25,90 €![Opinion of Judge N.K. Hall of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York]( "Opinion of Judge N.K. Hall of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York")
Opinion of Judge N.K. Hall of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York16,90 €![Differences in Nuclear DNA Preservation in Human Skeletal Remains]( "Differences in Nuclear DNA Preservation in Human Skeletal Remains")
Differences in Nuclear DNA Preservation in Human Skeletal Remains32,99 €![Social DNA]( "Social DNA")
Social DNA41,99 €
The rapid advancement of DNA techniques has turned
courtrooms into scientific forums. The principal aim
of this dissertation, from a Canadian perspective,
was to evalute how judges and jurors interpret,
perceive, and understand DNA evidence. In order to
address this research question, a multi-method
design was adopted consisting of the following:
three separate focus groups (consisting of jury
eligible persons, defence lawyers, and Crown
prosecutors); seven in-depth interviews with Court
of Queen''s Bench Justices; 500 jury eligible
surveys; and a mock scripted murder trial. The data
suggests that jurors assign greater weight to DNA
evidence than they do other types of evidence.
Several recommendations unfolded as a result of this
research: the encouragement for jurors to take
notes, which includes providing jurors with note
books; encouragement by judges to allow written
questions from jurors; recognition of individual
learning styles including providing sworn jurors
with a learning style survey; making the courtroom a
more comfortable learning environment; and the
allowance for real jury research in Canada.
courtrooms into scientific forums. The principal aim
of this dissertation, from a Canadian perspective,
was to evalute how judges and jurors interpret,
perceive, and understand DNA evidence. In order to
address this research question, a multi-method
design was adopted consisting of the following:
three separate focus groups (consisting of jury
eligible persons, defence lawyers, and Crown
prosecutors); seven in-depth interviews with Court
of Queen''s Bench Justices; 500 jury eligible
surveys; and a mock scripted murder trial. The data
suggests that jurors assign greater weight to DNA
evidence than they do other types of evidence.
Several recommendations unfolded as a result of this
research: the encouragement for jurors to take
notes, which includes providing jurors with note
books; encouragement by judges to allow written
questions from jurors; recognition of individual
learning styles including providing sworn jurors
with a learning style survey; making the courtroom a
more comfortable learning environment; and the
allowance for real jury research in Canada.