Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee Of) V. Wise]( "Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee Of) V. Wise")
Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee Of) V. Wise19,99 €![Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.]( "Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.")
Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.25,99 €![Eldred v. Ashcroft]( "Eldred v. Ashcroft")
Eldred v. Ashcroft25,99 €![District of Columbia v. Heller]( "District of Columbia v. Heller")
District of Columbia v. Heller38,99 €![Brown v. Board of Education]( "Brown v. Board of Education")
Brown v. Board of Education29,99 €![Minersville School District v. Gobitis]( "Minersville School District v. Gobitis")
Minersville School District v. Gobitis25,99 €![Roe v. Wade]( "Roe v. Wade")
Roe v. Wade22,99 €
Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Domino''s Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, 546 U.S. 470 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving claims for racial discrimination against the right to make and enforce contracts under 42 U.S.C.
1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court ruled unanimously, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, that because agents of parties to contracts do not personally have rights under those contracts, they cannot state a claim under section 1981.
1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Court ruled unanimously, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, that because agents of parties to contracts do not personally have rights under those contracts, they cannot state a claim under section 1981.