Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Economic Philosophy]( "Economic Philosophy")
Economic Philosophy18,99 €![The Economics of John Maynard Keynes]( "The Economics of John Maynard Keynes")
The Economics of John Maynard Keynes33,99 €![The Meaning of Shared Value]( "The Meaning of Shared Value")
The Meaning of Shared Value46,99 €![Economics]( "Economics")
Economics40,99 €![The Making of Modern Economics]( "The Making of Modern Economics")
The Making of Modern Economics47,99 €![A Short History of Economic Thought]( "A Short History of Economic Thought")
A Short History of Economic Thought79,99 €![The Subtle Spectrum]( "The Subtle Spectrum")
The Subtle Spectrum18,99 €
Joan Robinson (1903-1983) was one of the greatest economists of the twentieth century and a fearless critic of free-market capitalism. A major figure in the controversial 'Cambridge School' of economics in the post-war period, she made fundamental contributions to the economics of international trade and development.
In Economic Philosophy Robinson looks behind the curtain of economics to reveal a constant battle between economics as a science and economics as ideology, which she argued was integral to economics. In her customary vivid and pellucid style, she criticizes early economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo, and neo-classical economists Alfred Marshall, Stanley Jevons and Leon Walras, over the question of value. She shows that what they respectively considered to be the generators of value - labour-time, marginal utility or preferences - are not scientific but 'metaphysical', and that it is frequently in ideology, not science, that we find the reason for the rejection of economic theories. She also weighs up the implications of the Keynesian revolution in economics, particularly whether Keynes's theories are applicable to developing economies. Robinson concludes with a prophetic lesson that resonates in today's turbulent and unequal economy: that the task of the economist is to combat the idea that the only values that count are those that can be measured in terms of money.
This Routledge Classics edition includes a new foreword by Sheila Dow.
In Economic Philosophy Robinson looks behind the curtain of economics to reveal a constant battle between economics as a science and economics as ideology, which she argued was integral to economics. In her customary vivid and pellucid style, she criticizes early economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo, and neo-classical economists Alfred Marshall, Stanley Jevons and Leon Walras, over the question of value. She shows that what they respectively considered to be the generators of value - labour-time, marginal utility or preferences - are not scientific but 'metaphysical', and that it is frequently in ideology, not science, that we find the reason for the rejection of economic theories. She also weighs up the implications of the Keynesian revolution in economics, particularly whether Keynes's theories are applicable to developing economies. Robinson concludes with a prophetic lesson that resonates in today's turbulent and unequal economy: that the task of the economist is to combat the idea that the only values that count are those that can be measured in terms of money.
This Routledge Classics edition includes a new foreword by Sheila Dow.
"Not just a great woman economist, Joan Robinson was a brilliant public intellectual - something rarely produced by contemporary British economics." - The Guardian
"One of the greatest economic theorists of our time-and probably the greatest woman economist ever." - The New York Times
"One of the greatest economic theorists of our time-and probably the greatest woman economist ever." - The New York Times
"Not just a great woman economist, Joan Robinson was a brilliant public intellectual - something rarely produced by contemporary British economics." - The Guardian
"One of the greatest economic theorists of our time-and probably the greatest woman economist ever." - The New York Times
"One of the greatest economic theorists of our time-and probably the greatest woman economist ever." - The New York Times