Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Culture, Economy, Power: Anthropology as Critique, Anthropology as Praxis]( "Culture, Economy, Power: Anthropology as Critique, Anthropology as Praxis")
Culture, Economy, Power: Anthropology as Critique, Anthropology as Praxis103,99 €![Two Lectures On the Connection Between the Biblical and Physical History of Man: Delivered by Invitation From the Chair of Political Economy, Etc., of]( "Two Lectures On the Connection Between the Biblical and Physical History of Man: Delivered by Invitation From the Chair of Political Economy, Etc., of")
Two Lectures On the Connection Between the Biblical and Physical History of Man: Delivered by Invitation From the Chair of Political Economy, Etc., of34,99 €![Another Arabesque: Syrian-Lebanese Ethnicity in Neoliberal Brazil]( "Another Arabesque: Syrian-Lebanese Ethnicity in Neoliberal Brazil")
Another Arabesque: Syrian-Lebanese Ethnicity in Neoliberal Brazil85,99 €![Crossing the Neoliberal Line: Pacific Rim Migration and the Metropolis]( "Crossing the Neoliberal Line: Pacific Rim Migration and the Metropolis")
Crossing the Neoliberal Line: Pacific Rim Migration and the Metropolis76,99 €![What's Wrong With Ethnography?]( "What's Wrong With Ethnography?")
What's Wrong With Ethnography?71,99 €![Anti-Neoliberal Populisms in Comparative Perspective]( "Anti-Neoliberal Populisms in Comparative Perspective")
Anti-Neoliberal Populisms in Comparative Perspective194,99 €![Louisiana Culture from the Colonial Era to Katrina]( "Louisiana Culture from the Colonial Era to Katrina")
Louisiana Culture from the Colonial Era to Katrina55,99 €
Corporate scandals since the 1990s have made it clear that economic wrongdoing is more common in Western societies than might be expected. This volume examines the relationship between such wrong-doing and the neoliberal orientations, policies, and practices that have been influential since around 1980, considering whether neoliberalism has affected the likelihood that people and firms will act in ways that many people would consider wrong. It furthermore asks whether ideas of economic right and wrong have become so fragmented and localized that collective judgement has become almost impossible.