Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Written feedback to Doctoral Students]( "Written feedback to Doctoral Students")
Written feedback to Doctoral Students40,99 €![The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region]( "The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region")
The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region74,99 €![The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region]( "The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region")
The Assessment of L2 Written English across the MENA Region74,99 €![Written Expression]( "Written Expression")
Written Expression36,99 €![Concept processing and generating approach as for written discourse]( "Concept processing and generating approach as for written discourse")
Concept processing and generating approach as for written discourse44,99 €![Use of ¿Have¿ in Written English in an Interlanguage Perspective - ESL]( "Use of ¿Have¿ in Written English in an Interlanguage Perspective - ESL")
Use of ¿Have¿ in Written English in an Interlanguage Perspective - ESL26,99 €![Pragmatics and written communicative competence]( "Pragmatics and written communicative competence")
Pragmatics and written communicative competence39,99 €
The study examines the effect of unfocused vs. focused written corrective feedback on the writing accuracy of Iranian advanced EFL learners.The findings revealed that the participants in the focused group improved in their writing accuracy although the improvement was not significant. However, it was found that the unfocused group performed worse in comparison to the scores obtained from their pre-test. This might adhere to some researchers claims that corrective feedback might not be effective since learners acquisition of various grammatical features is slow and complicated and that when feedback on various structures is provided, learners might be unable or unwilling to make use of them effectively while composing a new piece of writing.