A management agency --such as a publicly or privately owned electric utility -- must, if it is to be efficient in carrying out its day-to-day tasks, have a means of monitoring its performance to assess the efficiency of its operations and the effectiveness of its planning. For example, how did the demand for electricity compare with that assumed in planning? How effective were the incentives applied to induce energy conservation by users? Such ex post analyses are essential for improving the planning process and hence for improving decisions with respect to efficiency and resource allocation.…mehr
A management agency --such as a publicly or privately owned electric utility -- must, if it is to be efficient in carrying out its day-to-day tasks, have a means of monitoring its performance to assess the efficiency of its operations and the effectiveness of its planning. For example, how did the demand for electricity compare with that assumed in planning? How effective were the incentives applied to induce energy conservation by users? Such ex post analyses are essential for improving the planning process and hence for improving decisions with respect to efficiency and resource allocation. Unfortunately, it seems to be very difficult for public agencies to make such ex post evaluations an integral part of agency activities, whether the agencies are "producers," e. g. , the Corps of Engineers or the Bureau of Reclamation with respect to water resources management, or are regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food and Drug Administration. Here and there a few ex post analyses of agency programs have been done, but rarely by the responsible agency itself. These analyses have attempted to compare the results actually achieved with the results estimated in planning, either in terms of project outputs or in terms of effectiveness of regulatory and/or economic incentives in inducing desired changes in behavior.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
1. Introduction.- 2. Regulatory Approaches.- Elements of a Regulatory Program.- The Clean Water Act.- The Clean Air Act.- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.- 3. Technology Approach.- Pollution Control Costs And Effluents.- Water Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 3-A. Costs for Indirect-Discharging Mills.- Appendix 3-B. Pulp and Paper Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 3-C. Water Pollution Control Cost Estimation.- Appendix 3-D. Water Pollution Control Cost Comparisons.- Appendix 3-E. Loadings Data.- Appendix 3-F. Water Quality Model.- Appendix 3-G. Model Validation.- Appendix 3-H. Visitation Estimates.- Appendix 3-I. Recreation Benefit Studies.- Appendix 3-J. Sensitivity Analysis for Benefit Calculations.- 4. Ambient Approach.- Pollution Control Costs and Emissions.- Air Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 4-A SO2 Emissions and Costs.- Appendix 4-B. Pulp-Producing Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 4-C. Air Pollution Control Costs (TSP).- Appendix 4-D. Air Pollution Control Cost Comparisons.- Appendix 4-E. Loadings Data.- Appendix 4-F. Air Quality Model.- Appendix 4-G. Emissions Versus Concentrations.- Appendix 4-H. Model Validation.- Appendix 4-I Derivation of Concentration Response Functions for Health Effects.- 5. Benefits Approach.- Pollution Control Costs and Emissions.- Air Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 5-A Kraft Pulp Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 5-B. Air Pollution Control Cost Estimation (TRS).- Appendix 5-C. TRS Emissions.- Appendix 5-D. The MPTER Model.- 6. Compliance.- Measuring Compliance.- Water Compliance.- Air Compliance.- Findings.- 7. Growth.- Conventional Water Pollutants.- Criteria Air Pollutants - TSP.- Designated Air Pollutants - TRS.- Findings.- Appendix 7-A. 1984-1994 TRS Emission Reduction Policies.- 8. Toxic Pollutants.- Water Pollutants - Dioxin.- Chloroform - Air Pollutant.- Chloroform - Hazardous Waste.- Findings.- Appendix 8-A. Mills in the TOX Analysis.- Appendix 8-B. Critique of the Chloroform Risk Assessment.- Appendix 8-C. Process Modification Costs.- Appendix 8-D. Mill-Specific Costs for Hypochlorite Elimination.- Appendix 8-E. Mill-Specific Costs for Chloroform Reduction.- 9. Conclusions.- Regulatory Approaches.- Historical Perspective.- Future Direction.- Appendix A. The Pulp and Paper Industry.- Industry Profile.- Capacity.- Geographic Distribution.- Standard Manufacturing Processes.- Preparing Raw Material.- Pulping.- Bleaching of Wood Pulps.- Papermaking.- Converting.- Sources of Wastes.- Water Effluents.- Air Emissions.- Solid Wastes.- Estimated Generation of Wastes.- Appendix B. Mills Evaluated in the Study.- Appendix C. Inflation Indexes.- Appendix D. Glossary of Environmental Terms.- Author Index.
1. Introduction.- 2. Regulatory Approaches.- Elements of a Regulatory Program.- The Clean Water Act.- The Clean Air Act.- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.- 3. Technology Approach.- Pollution Control Costs And Effluents.- Water Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 3-A. Costs for Indirect-Discharging Mills.- Appendix 3-B. Pulp and Paper Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 3-C. Water Pollution Control Cost Estimation.- Appendix 3-D. Water Pollution Control Cost Comparisons.- Appendix 3-E. Loadings Data.- Appendix 3-F. Water Quality Model.- Appendix 3-G. Model Validation.- Appendix 3-H. Visitation Estimates.- Appendix 3-I. Recreation Benefit Studies.- Appendix 3-J. Sensitivity Analysis for Benefit Calculations.- 4. Ambient Approach.- Pollution Control Costs and Emissions.- Air Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 4-A SO2 Emissions and Costs.- Appendix 4-B. Pulp-Producing Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 4-C. Air Pollution Control Costs (TSP).- Appendix 4-D. Air Pollution Control Cost Comparisons.- Appendix 4-E. Loadings Data.- Appendix 4-F. Air Quality Model.- Appendix 4-G. Emissions Versus Concentrations.- Appendix 4-H. Model Validation.- Appendix 4-I Derivation of Concentration Response Functions for Health Effects.- 5. Benefits Approach.- Pollution Control Costs and Emissions.- Air Quality Impacts.- Monetary Benefits.- Findings.- Appendix 5-A Kraft Pulp Mills Evaluated in this Study.- Appendix 5-B. Air Pollution Control Cost Estimation (TRS).- Appendix 5-C. TRS Emissions.- Appendix 5-D. The MPTER Model.- 6. Compliance.- Measuring Compliance.- Water Compliance.- Air Compliance.- Findings.- 7. Growth.- Conventional Water Pollutants.- Criteria Air Pollutants - TSP.- Designated Air Pollutants - TRS.- Findings.- Appendix 7-A. 1984-1994 TRS Emission Reduction Policies.- 8. Toxic Pollutants.- Water Pollutants - Dioxin.- Chloroform - Air Pollutant.- Chloroform - Hazardous Waste.- Findings.- Appendix 8-A. Mills in the TOX Analysis.- Appendix 8-B. Critique of the Chloroform Risk Assessment.- Appendix 8-C. Process Modification Costs.- Appendix 8-D. Mill-Specific Costs for Hypochlorite Elimination.- Appendix 8-E. Mill-Specific Costs for Chloroform Reduction.- 9. Conclusions.- Regulatory Approaches.- Historical Perspective.- Future Direction.- Appendix A. The Pulp and Paper Industry.- Industry Profile.- Capacity.- Geographic Distribution.- Standard Manufacturing Processes.- Preparing Raw Material.- Pulping.- Bleaching of Wood Pulps.- Papermaking.- Converting.- Sources of Wastes.- Water Effluents.- Air Emissions.- Solid Wastes.- Estimated Generation of Wastes.- Appendix B. Mills Evaluated in the Study.- Appendix C. Inflation Indexes.- Appendix D. Glossary of Environmental Terms.- Author Index.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Internetauftritt der buecher.de internetstores GmbH
Geschäftsführung: Monica Sawhney | Roland Kölbl | Günter Hilger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Batheyer Straße 115 - 117, 58099 Hagen
Postanschrift: Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg
Amtsgericht Hagen HRB 13257
Steuernummer: 321/5800/1497