38,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
  • Broschiertes Buch

The debate over whether English language teachers should include or exclude students native language in their instruction has been a contentious issue for a long time but as of yet the research findings have not been persuasive. The present study investigated the beliefs and instructional practices with respect to the use of L1 by Iranian EFL high school teachers. In general, the findings showed that there existed no correlation between the teachers beliefs and their instructional practices. However, this study found that in certain areas of teacher talk, there was a relationship between the…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
The debate over whether English language teachers should include or exclude students native language in their instruction has been a contentious issue for a long time but as of yet the research findings have not been persuasive. The present study investigated the beliefs and instructional practices with respect to the use of L1 by Iranian EFL high school teachers. In general, the findings showed that there existed no correlation between the teachers beliefs and their instructional practices. However, this study found that in certain areas of teacher talk, there was a relationship between the stated beliefs and practices. Furthermore, there was a consistency between some micro- and macro- functions of language and the use of L1 by teachers. Reading this book can help non-native English teachers to reflect on their practices and beliefs regarding code-switching and the use of their learners' mother tongue in their English classes.
Autorenporträt
Javad Gholami is an Assistant Professor in TESOL from Urmia University, Iran. His publications have been on integrating focus on form instruction & communicative language teaching in ELT. Shadi Negahdar, an MA graduate in TESOL, is a lecturer in Sanandaj, Iran. Her research interests are applied linguistics and foreign language pedagogy.