John Mikhail is Associate Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center.
Inhaltsangabe
Part I. Theory: 1. The question presented 2. A new framework for the theory of moral cognition 3. The basic elements of Rawls' linguistic analogy Part II. Empirical Adequacy: 4. The problem of descriptive adequacy 5. The moral grammar hypothesis 6. Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: a formal model Part III. Objections and Replies: 7. R. M. Hare and the distinction between empirical and normative adequacy 8. Thomas Nagel and the competence-performance distinction 9. Ronald Dworkin and the distinction between I-morality and E-morality Part IV. Conclusion: 10. Toward a universal moral grammar.
Part I. Theory: 1. The question presented 2. A new framework for the theory of moral cognition 3. The basic elements of Rawls' linguistic analogy Part II. Empirical Adequacy: 4. The problem of descriptive adequacy 5. The moral grammar hypothesis 6. Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: a formal model Part III. Objections and Replies: 7. R. M. Hare and the distinction between empirical and normative adequacy 8. Thomas Nagel and the competence-performance distinction 9. Ronald Dworkin and the distinction between I-morality and E-morality Part IV. Conclusion: 10. Toward a universal moral grammar.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
