Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Foreign Policy of the United States in Guatemala]( "Foreign Policy of the United States in Guatemala")
Foreign Policy of the United States in Guatemala26,99 €![The United States, Texas, and High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal]( "The United States, Texas, and High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal")
The United States, Texas, and High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal51,99 €![United Nations Peacebuilding Process in Cameroon and Nigeria]( "United Nations Peacebuilding Process in Cameroon and Nigeria")
United Nations Peacebuilding Process in Cameroon and Nigeria42,99 €![Etats-Unis, Europe et Union européenne / The United States, Europe and the European Union]( "Etats-Unis, Europe et Union européenne / The United States, Europe and the European Union")
Etats-Unis, Europe et Union européenne / The United States, Europe and the European Union43,95 €![A People & a Nation: A History of the United States]( "A People & a Nation: A History of the United States")
A People & a Nation: A History of the United States161,99 €![The United States and Western Europe Since 1945]( "The United States and Western Europe Since 1945")
The United States and Western Europe Since 1945149,99 €![Martin Luther King Set In Stone: The Civil Rights Movement Remembered]( "Martin Luther King Set In Stone: The Civil Rights Movement Remembered")
Martin Luther King Set In Stone: The Civil Rights Movement Remembered16,99 €
NATO's Committee of Three on Non-Military Cooperation was established in 1956, tasked with studying the possibility of extending non-military cooperation in the Alliance. The Committee presented its report in November 1956, in the wake of the Suez Crisis. This study investigates the Norwegian and US positions on non-military cooperation. The conclusions of the Committee of Three have been thought to have been overshadowed by the Suez Crisis, and the lack of concrete results of the Committee's report have been explained by this. This study concludes that this was not the case. The lack of proper implementation of the Committee's recommendations was due to the NATO members' lack of willingness to cooperate in ways that could limit sovereignty. This was also the case for Norway, despite the vocal support for non-military cooperation from the Norwegian Government.