EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty Before National Courts
The Case of the Habitats Directive
Herausgeber: Eliantonio, Mariolina; Paloniitty, Tiina; Lees, Emma
EU Environmental Principles and Scientific Uncertainty Before National Courts
The Case of the Habitats Directive
Herausgeber: Eliantonio, Mariolina; Paloniitty, Tiina; Lees, Emma
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This comparative book explores the dynamics driving how courts across Europe and beyond understand and analyse scientific information in nature conservation. The Habitats and the Birds Directives-the core of EU nature conservation law-are usually seen as the most 'uniform' parts of EU environmental law. This book analyses the case law from 11 current and former EU Member States' courts and explores the dynamics of how, and crucially why, their understandings of scientific uncertainty on the one hand, and EU environmental principles on the other, vary. The courts' scope and depth of review,…mehr
- Social and Scientific Uncertainties in Environmental Law172,99 €
- The Habitats Directive in its EU Environmental Law Context74,99 €
- David John DoukasPlanning for Uncertainty27,99 €
- Maria O'NeillThe Evolving EU Counter-terrorism Legal Framework76,99 €
- Jörg KammerhoferUncertainty in International Law59,99 €
- Kenneth R. FosterJudging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts12,99 €
- Charles BartonAn Historical Treatise of a Suit in Equity: In Which Is Attempted a Scientific Deduction of the Preceedings Used On the Equity Sides of the Courts of24,99 €
-
-
-
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Academic
- Seitenzahl: 448
- Erscheinungstermin: 17. Oktober 2024
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 454g
- ISBN-13: 9781509948239
- ISBN-10: 1509948236
- Artikelnr.: 69312908
- Verlag: Bloomsbury Academic
- Seitenzahl: 448
- Erscheinungstermin: 17. Oktober 2024
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 454g
- ISBN-13: 9781509948239
- ISBN-10: 1509948236
- Artikelnr.: 69312908
Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and Tiina Paloniitty
(University of Helsinki, Finland) Part I: Setting the Scene: Courts,
Science and the Habitats Directive 1. 'Science' in Court - The Importance
of Specificity Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and Tiina
Paloniitty (University of Helsinki, Finland) 2. The European Court of
Justice's Approach to Scientific and Factual Matters in the Habitats
Directive - Between Uncertainty and Precaution Augustin Garcia Ureta
(University of the Basque Country, Spain) Part II: Reviewing Science and
Law in the Member States' Courts 3. Judicial Review and Enforcement of The
Habitats Directive in Ireland Áine Ryall (University College Cork, Ireland)
4. The Boundaries of Administrative Judicial Review in Lithuania in Natura
2000 Cases Jurgita Pauzaite-Kulvinskiene (Vilnius University, Lithuania)
and Indre Zvaigzdiniene (Vilnius University, Lithuania) 5. The Scrutiny of
Scientific Evidence by UK Courts in Environmental Decisions: Legality, the
Fact-Law Distinction, and (Sometimes) Self-Limiting Review Catherine Caine
(University of Exeter, UK) and Richard Broadbent (Freeths LLP, UK) 6.
Judicial Review of the Application of Article 6(3) Habitats Directive: How
the Dutch Council of State Integrates Science, Expertise and Scientific
Uncertainty Floor Fleurke (Tilburg University, the Netherlands) 7. Of
Ostensible Self-Restraint, Explicit Environmental Protection, and a Missing
Link: the Appropriate Assessment in Italy Roberto Caranta (Turin
University, Italy) 8. Legal Approaches to Scientific Uncertainty in Germany
- The Case of EU Nature Conservation Law Wolfgang Köck (Helmholz Centre for
Environmental Research - UFZ, Germany) and Till Markus (University of
Bremen, Germany) 9. Reasoning Styles, the Role of Discretionary Judicial
Choices and the Limits of Judicial Review: the Hungarian Courts' Experience
with the Habitats and the Bird Directives Katalin Sulyok (Eötvös Loránd
University, Hungary) 10. The EU Nature Conservation Law in Finnish Judicial
Review: Various Avenues, Coalescing Case Law? Tiina Paloniitty (University
of Helsinki, Finland) and Hanna Nieminen-Finne (Vaasa Administrative Court,
Finland) 11. The Intensity of Judicial Review in Environmental Litigation
in Greek Law with Special Regard to Habitats Sites Konstantinos Gogos
(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece) 12. The Weakness of the
Judiciary and the Poor Implementation of the Habitats Directive: How
Judicial Self-Restraint Endangers Biodiversity Protection in France
François-Vivien Guiot (University of Pau, France) 13. The Habitats
Directive in the Romanian Courts: Procedure vs Substance Dacian Dragos
(Babes Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania) and Bogdana Neamtu (Babes
Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Part III Broadening the View
14. Biodiversity in the Court: The Certainty of Contests about Uncertainty
Brian J Preston (The New South Wales Land and Environment Court, Australia)
15. Scientific Uncertainty before the Court of Justice and the General
Court: Is the Judicial Toolbox Sufficient? Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht
University, the Netherlands) and Michal Krajewski (Maastricht University,
the Netherlands) Conclusions Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht University,
the Netherlands), Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and
Tiina Paloniitty (University of Helsinki, Finland)
Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and Tiina Paloniitty
(University of Helsinki, Finland) Part I: Setting the Scene: Courts,
Science and the Habitats Directive 1. 'Science' in Court - The Importance
of Specificity Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and Tiina
Paloniitty (University of Helsinki, Finland) 2. The European Court of
Justice's Approach to Scientific and Factual Matters in the Habitats
Directive - Between Uncertainty and Precaution Augustin Garcia Ureta
(University of the Basque Country, Spain) Part II: Reviewing Science and
Law in the Member States' Courts 3. Judicial Review and Enforcement of The
Habitats Directive in Ireland Áine Ryall (University College Cork, Ireland)
4. The Boundaries of Administrative Judicial Review in Lithuania in Natura
2000 Cases Jurgita Pauzaite-Kulvinskiene (Vilnius University, Lithuania)
and Indre Zvaigzdiniene (Vilnius University, Lithuania) 5. The Scrutiny of
Scientific Evidence by UK Courts in Environmental Decisions: Legality, the
Fact-Law Distinction, and (Sometimes) Self-Limiting Review Catherine Caine
(University of Exeter, UK) and Richard Broadbent (Freeths LLP, UK) 6.
Judicial Review of the Application of Article 6(3) Habitats Directive: How
the Dutch Council of State Integrates Science, Expertise and Scientific
Uncertainty Floor Fleurke (Tilburg University, the Netherlands) 7. Of
Ostensible Self-Restraint, Explicit Environmental Protection, and a Missing
Link: the Appropriate Assessment in Italy Roberto Caranta (Turin
University, Italy) 8. Legal Approaches to Scientific Uncertainty in Germany
- The Case of EU Nature Conservation Law Wolfgang Köck (Helmholz Centre for
Environmental Research - UFZ, Germany) and Till Markus (University of
Bremen, Germany) 9. Reasoning Styles, the Role of Discretionary Judicial
Choices and the Limits of Judicial Review: the Hungarian Courts' Experience
with the Habitats and the Bird Directives Katalin Sulyok (Eötvös Loránd
University, Hungary) 10. The EU Nature Conservation Law in Finnish Judicial
Review: Various Avenues, Coalescing Case Law? Tiina Paloniitty (University
of Helsinki, Finland) and Hanna Nieminen-Finne (Vaasa Administrative Court,
Finland) 11. The Intensity of Judicial Review in Environmental Litigation
in Greek Law with Special Regard to Habitats Sites Konstantinos Gogos
(Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece) 12. The Weakness of the
Judiciary and the Poor Implementation of the Habitats Directive: How
Judicial Self-Restraint Endangers Biodiversity Protection in France
François-Vivien Guiot (University of Pau, France) 13. The Habitats
Directive in the Romanian Courts: Procedure vs Substance Dacian Dragos
(Babes Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania) and Bogdana Neamtu (Babes
Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania) Part III Broadening the View
14. Biodiversity in the Court: The Certainty of Contests about Uncertainty
Brian J Preston (The New South Wales Land and Environment Court, Australia)
15. Scientific Uncertainty before the Court of Justice and the General
Court: Is the Judicial Toolbox Sufficient? Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht
University, the Netherlands) and Michal Krajewski (Maastricht University,
the Netherlands) Conclusions Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht University,
the Netherlands), Emma Lees (European University Institute, Italy) and
Tiina Paloniitty (University of Helsinki, Finland)