European Parliament and Delegated Legislation
An Institutional Balance Perspective
Herausgeber: Lupo, Nicola; Schütze, Robert
European Parliament and Delegated Legislation
An Institutional Balance Perspective
Herausgeber: Lupo, Nicola; Schütze, Robert
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This book revisits the Treaty of Lisbon's promise to further parliamentarize the EU's functioning by looking into the Treaty-law framework governing the delegation of legislative power in the EU. In this field, the Lisbon Treaty formally greatly strengthened the position of the European Parliament vis-à-vis both the European Commission and the Council. The book explores whether Parliament's formally reinforced role is reflected in the actual balance of powers in the area of delegated legislation and executive rule-making. It does so by assessing how both the law and practice of decision-making…mehr
- E-Parliament and ICT-Based Legislation175,99 €
- Cecil T. CarrDelegated Legislation24,99 €
- Stuart Casey-MaslenJus ad Bellum39,99 €
- John MiltonAreopagitica ; A Speech for the Liberty of Unlicensed Printing to the Parliament of England12,99 €
- Parliament of England41,99 €
- John HildropA Letter To A Member Of Parliament20,99 €
- Umidjon FayzullaevEUTHANASIA32,99 €
-
-
-
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Bloomsbury 3PL
- Seitenzahl: 232
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. November 2022
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 250mm x 175mm x 17mm
- Gewicht: 589g
- ISBN-13: 9781509931859
- ISBN-10: 1509931856
- Artikelnr.: 61991052
- Verlag: Bloomsbury 3PL
- Seitenzahl: 232
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. November 2022
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 250mm x 175mm x 17mm
- Gewicht: 589g
- ISBN-13: 9781509931859
- ISBN-10: 1509931856
- Artikelnr.: 61991052
Yardstick for Assessing Institutional Developments A. Devising an
Institutional Balance Test B. Applying the Institutional Balance Test to
Identify Constitutional Modifications II. Structure of the Enquiry 2. A
Formal Reading of the Lisbon Treaty I. The Formal Catalogue of Acts II. The
Lisbon Treaty's 'Atypical' Acts III. The Distinction between Delegated and
Implementing Acts: A Cursory Reading of the TFEU A. Key Features of Article
290 TFEU B. Key Features of Article 291 TFEU IV. Parliamentary Control Over
Post-Lisbon Executive Acts 3. The Road Leading Up to the Lisbon Treaty I.
Comitology's Origins and Original Sin II. Judicial Sanctioning of
Comitology and the Commission's Broad Implementing Powers III. From the
Single European Act to the 2006 Revision of the Second Comitology Decision
A. Codification: The SEA and the First Comitology Decision B. A Call for
Parliamentarisation and the Second Comitology Decision C. The Constitution
and the Amendment of the Second Comitology Decision IV. A Recalibrated
Institutional Balance 4. The Exponential Multiplication of Delimitation
Problems I. Delimitation of Autonomous Executive Acts against (Delegated)
Legislation and Implementation A. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Legislation
B. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Implementation C. Institutional
Implications II. Delimitation of Legislation and Delegation III.
Delimitation of Delegated and Implementing Acts A. Judicial Clarifications
in Biocides, Eures Network and Visa Reciprocity B. Amendments as
Implementation C. The PRAC, a Zombie in EU Law D. The 2019
Inter-Institutional Agreement E. Legislative Practice in Light of the 2019
IIA 5. Delegated Power: Further Limits and Procedure I. The Passive
Personal Scope of Article 290 TFEU II. Breaking Down the Specificity
Requirement A. Duration and Objectives B. Content and Scope III. Testing
Specificity in Practice IV. Procedural Limits to the Exercise of Delegated
Powers A. The Drafting of Delegated Acts B. The Control Exercised by the
Legislator: Objection and Revocation 6. Implementing Power: Triggering
Factors, Nature, Extent and Procedure I. The Notion of Uniform Conditions
II. Reconceptualising Implementing Powers Post-Lisbon A. May Implementing
Acts Implement Delegated Acts? B. The Nature and Extent of Implementing
Powers under Article 291 TFEU C. The Eures Network Standard as the Single
Standard for Implementation D. The Institutions' Constitutional
Modification of Article 291(2) TFEU III. Exceptional Implementation by the
Council A. CFSP Implementation by the Council B. Duly Justified Specific
Cases of Implementation by the Council C. Implementation by the European
Council IV. The (not so) Closed List of Implementing actors and
Implementing Acts A. EU Agencies B. Sui Generis Implementing Acts V. The
Comitology Procedures A. The Proposal for and Negotiations on the
Comitology Regulation B. The Comitology Regulation C. The Functioning of
the Post-Lisbon Comitology Regime D. The European Parliament's Droit de
Regard VI. No Self-Love, the 2017 Proposal to Amend the Comitology
Regulation 7. The Practice and Politics of Delegated Legislation I.
Strategies in Delegating Powers A. Adding Levels and Strategies to the
Model B. Testing the Model II. General Data Protection Regulation A. The
Commission's Proposal B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the GDPR
C. Assessment III. Data Governance Act A. The Commission's Proposal B. The
Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the Data Governance Act C. Assessment
IV. Refining the Model 8. Conclusion I. Looking Back . II. . to Move
Forward Annex: Overview of Autonomous Executive Legal Bases
Yardstick for Assessing Institutional Developments A. Devising an
Institutional Balance Test B. Applying the Institutional Balance Test to
Identify Constitutional Modifications II. Structure of the Enquiry 2. A
Formal Reading of the Lisbon Treaty I. The Formal Catalogue of Acts II. The
Lisbon Treaty's 'Atypical' Acts III. The Distinction between Delegated and
Implementing Acts: A Cursory Reading of the TFEU A. Key Features of Article
290 TFEU B. Key Features of Article 291 TFEU IV. Parliamentary Control Over
Post-Lisbon Executive Acts 3. The Road Leading Up to the Lisbon Treaty I.
Comitology's Origins and Original Sin II. Judicial Sanctioning of
Comitology and the Commission's Broad Implementing Powers III. From the
Single European Act to the 2006 Revision of the Second Comitology Decision
A. Codification: The SEA and the First Comitology Decision B. A Call for
Parliamentarisation and the Second Comitology Decision C. The Constitution
and the Amendment of the Second Comitology Decision IV. A Recalibrated
Institutional Balance 4. The Exponential Multiplication of Delimitation
Problems I. Delimitation of Autonomous Executive Acts against (Delegated)
Legislation and Implementation A. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Legislation
B. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Implementation C. Institutional
Implications II. Delimitation of Legislation and Delegation III.
Delimitation of Delegated and Implementing Acts A. Judicial Clarifications
in Biocides, Eures Network and Visa Reciprocity B. Amendments as
Implementation C. The PRAC, a Zombie in EU Law D. The 2019
Inter-Institutional Agreement E. Legislative Practice in Light of the 2019
IIA 5. Delegated Power: Further Limits and Procedure I. The Passive
Personal Scope of Article 290 TFEU II. Breaking Down the Specificity
Requirement A. Duration and Objectives B. Content and Scope III. Testing
Specificity in Practice IV. Procedural Limits to the Exercise of Delegated
Powers A. The Drafting of Delegated Acts B. The Control Exercised by the
Legislator: Objection and Revocation 6. Implementing Power: Triggering
Factors, Nature, Extent and Procedure I. The Notion of Uniform Conditions
II. Reconceptualising Implementing Powers Post-Lisbon A. May Implementing
Acts Implement Delegated Acts? B. The Nature and Extent of Implementing
Powers under Article 291 TFEU C. The Eures Network Standard as the Single
Standard for Implementation D. The Institutions' Constitutional
Modification of Article 291(2) TFEU III. Exceptional Implementation by the
Council A. CFSP Implementation by the Council B. Duly Justified Specific
Cases of Implementation by the Council C. Implementation by the European
Council IV. The (not so) Closed List of Implementing actors and
Implementing Acts A. EU Agencies B. Sui Generis Implementing Acts V. The
Comitology Procedures A. The Proposal for and Negotiations on the
Comitology Regulation B. The Comitology Regulation C. The Functioning of
the Post-Lisbon Comitology Regime D. The European Parliament's Droit de
Regard VI. No Self-Love, the 2017 Proposal to Amend the Comitology
Regulation 7. The Practice and Politics of Delegated Legislation I.
Strategies in Delegating Powers A. Adding Levels and Strategies to the
Model B. Testing the Model II. General Data Protection Regulation A. The
Commission's Proposal B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the GDPR
C. Assessment III. Data Governance Act A. The Commission's Proposal B. The
Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the Data Governance Act C. Assessment
IV. Refining the Model 8. Conclusion I. Looking Back . II. . to Move
Forward Annex: Overview of Autonomous Executive Legal Bases