John Keown
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy
John Keown
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
A unique, documented case against the legalisation of 'assisted dying', based mainly on empirical and logical 'slippery slope' concerns.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Matti HayryThe Ethics and Governance of Human Genetic Databases141,99 €
- D. TownendResearch Ethics Committees, Data Protection and Medical Research in European Countries175,99 €
- Richard HuxtableEuthanasia, Ethics and the Law215,99 €
- Bioethics in Action110,99 €
- Alasdair MacleanAutonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law141,99 €
- Daniel SperlingPosthumous Interests162,99 €
- COVID-19 and the Law112,99 €
-
-
-
A unique, documented case against the legalisation of 'assisted dying', based mainly on empirical and logical 'slippery slope' concerns.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 560
- Erscheinungstermin: 12. Februar 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 34mm
- Gewicht: 954g
- ISBN-13: 9781107043206
- ISBN-10: 1107043204
- Artikelnr.: 53022969
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 560
- Erscheinungstermin: 12. Februar 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 34mm
- Gewicht: 954g
- ISBN-13: 9781107043206
- ISBN-10: 1107043204
- Artikelnr.: 53022969
John Keown is a leading and widely-published authority on the law and ethics of medicine. Before being appointed to the Rose Kennedy Chair in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown, he taught medical law in the Faculty of Law at Cambridge. In 2015 he was made a Doctor of Civil Law by Oxford for his contribution to law and bioethics. A focus of his research, which has been cited by the Law Lords and by the US Supreme Court, has been the law and practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands. That research formed the centrepiece to the first edition of this work, which was widely acclaimed.
Part I. Definitions: 1. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
Part I. Definitions: 1. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.
2. Intended v. foreseen life-shortening
Part II. The Ethical Debate: Human Life, Autonomy, Legal Hypocrisy, and the 'Slippery Slope'
3. The value of human life
4. The value of autonomy
5. Legal hypocrisy?
6. The slippery slope arguments
Part III. The Dutch Experience: 7. The guidelines
8. The first survey: the incidence of 'euthanasia'
9. Breach of the guidelines
10. The slide towards NVAE
11. The second survey
12. The Dutch in denial?
13. The Euthanasia Act and the Code of Practice
14. Effective control since 2002?
15. Continuing concerns
16. A right to physician-assisted suicide by stopping eating and drinking?
17. Assisted suicide for the elderly with 'completed lives'
Part IV. Belgium: 18. The Belgian Legislation
19. The lack of effective control
Part V. Australia: 20. The Northern Territory: ROTTI
Part VI. The United States: 21. The United States: Oregon and six other jurisdictions
22. The US Supreme Court: Glucksberg and Vacco
Part VII. Canada: 23. The Supreme Court of Canada: the Carter case
24. Canada's euthanasia legislation
25. Conclusion.