Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Evaluating the Joint Impact of PSNP and OFSP in Rural Ethiopia]( "Evaluating the Joint Impact of PSNP and OFSP in Rural Ethiopia")
Evaluating the Joint Impact of PSNP and OFSP in Rural Ethiopia23,99 €![Evaluating Traffic Congestion Mitigation Strategies]( "Evaluating Traffic Congestion Mitigation Strategies")
Evaluating Traffic Congestion Mitigation Strategies26,99 €![Evaluating Egyptian Government's Health Spending on Children Mortality]( "Evaluating Egyptian Government's Health Spending on Children Mortality")
Evaluating Egyptian Government's Health Spending on Children Mortality32,99 €![Evaluating the Beginning of Developmental State in Ethiopia]( "Evaluating the Beginning of Developmental State in Ethiopia")
Evaluating the Beginning of Developmental State in Ethiopia32,99 €![Evaluating Police Management Development Programs]( "Evaluating Police Management Development Programs")
Evaluating Police Management Development Programs81,99 €![An Evaluation of the Sustainability of Rural water Supply, Ethiopia]( "An Evaluation of the Sustainability of Rural water Supply, Ethiopia")
An Evaluation of the Sustainability of Rural water Supply, Ethiopia32,99 €![Development of Emerging Contractors]( "Development of Emerging Contractors")
Development of Emerging Contractors46,99 €
The paper "Evaluating rural development: a critical investigation of techniques and objectives used to assess the LEADER program of the EU in Hungary" investigates the evaluation of endogenous development from a methodological perspective both in theory and practice in the context of the LEADER program. It argues that the LEADER approach consists of a handful of features that cannot be evaluated entirely by quantitative measures. Although the use of exogenous methods is justified for the sake of information needs of certain stakeholders, endogenous evaluation incorporating qualitative measures is more appropriate to assess the value-added of LEADER. As opposed to the current approach, which overly emphasizes the exogenous forms of evaluation, the paper argues in favor of an evaluation design that takes into account the insight of the local actors as well. The paper responds to the challenge of satisfying the diverging information requirements of the stakeholders by introducing anevaluation tool that builds upon the endogenous appraisal of local stakeholders and at the same time enables the aggregation of the results on the extra-local level.