Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![EVALUATIVE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHERS WORKING IN THE SCHOOL]( "EVALUATIVE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHERS WORKING IN THE SCHOOL")
EVALUATIVE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHERS WORKING IN THE SCHOOL53,99 €![Teachers Competency On Performance Using Holistic-Center Learning Tool]( "Teachers Competency On Performance Using Holistic-Center Learning Tool")
Teachers Competency On Performance Using Holistic-Center Learning Tool53,99 €![Oral expression: practices and difficulties in the FLE classroom]( "Oral expression: practices and difficulties in the FLE classroom")
Oral expression: practices and difficulties in the FLE classroom26,99 €![Development of entrepreneurial skills from the systemic approach]( "Development of entrepreneurial skills from the systemic approach")
Development of entrepreneurial skills from the systemic approach44,99 €![Assessment in the learning process]( "Assessment in the learning process")
Assessment in the learning process29,99 €![A study about the reflection that teachers do about their practices]( "A study about the reflection that teachers do about their practices")
A study about the reflection that teachers do about their practices26,99 €![The action approach to learning French]( "The action approach to learning French")
The action approach to learning French26,99 €
The book reports on an experiment carried out by ten teachers and a researcher who worked together to improve their assessment practice. To achieve this, each contributed according to his or her field of expertise, the researcher in the sense of observing and analyzing teaching practices, and the teachers in the implementation and reflective analysis of the skills assessment process. The researcher used an observation grid to collect data characteristic of each teacher's assessment practice, which he then analyzed. Each teacher used a reflective analysis grid to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of his or her evaluation practice. This enabled them to test their pedagogical and didactic choices and deduce their impact on learner performance. The results obtained suggest an inappropriate implementation of competency assessment: indeed, the analysis shows that this evaluative practice, rather than referring to a socioconstructivist paradigm, is more reminiscent of a behaviourist paradigm.