Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Past Tense System in English and Romanian]( "The Past Tense System in English and Romanian")
The Past Tense System in English and Romanian17,95 €![Language and gender-related variation in English and Romanian]( "Language and gender-related variation in English and Romanian")
Language and gender-related variation in English and Romanian36,99 €![Romanian Contributions to English for Specific Purposes]( "Romanian Contributions to English for Specific Purposes")
Romanian Contributions to English for Specific Purposes35,99 €![Language Sketch Romanian]( "Language Sketch Romanian")
Language Sketch Romanian15,95 €![Queer Experimental Literature]( "Queer Experimental Literature")
Queer Experimental Literature21,99 €![Quill and Parchment: Critical Insights into Literature]( "Quill and Parchment: Critical Insights into Literature")
Quill and Parchment: Critical Insights into Literature36,99 €![Experimental ICT-Driven ESL Approach to Enhance LSRW Skills]( "Experimental ICT-Driven ESL Approach to Enhance LSRW Skills")
Experimental ICT-Driven ESL Approach to Enhance LSRW Skills51,99 €
This book investigates the syntax of Romanian ditransitives building on new experimental data with a view to enable a more accurate understanding of these constructions regarding their underlying configuration(s), the structural import of Differential Object Marking or Clitic Doubling among others.
One first attempt is to explain the (relatively) free word-order manifested by the two internal arguments, and their symmetrical potential for anaphor and possessor binding. Evidence is provided as to the relative hierarchical order of the two object DPs, with the direct object as the lower one.
The featural make-up of the two objects also proves crucial in disentangling the various experimentally uncovered aspects regarding their interaction e.g., differentially marked direct objects bear a [Person] feature and compete with the indirect object in valuing the person feature of the applicative. The feature specification is further refined function of the presence of clitic doubling or the lack thereof.
The experimental insights we gain into the syntax of Romanian ditransitives help us integrate them with their counterparts in Romance thereby contributing to a better cross-linguistic understanding of these constructions.
One first attempt is to explain the (relatively) free word-order manifested by the two internal arguments, and their symmetrical potential for anaphor and possessor binding. Evidence is provided as to the relative hierarchical order of the two object DPs, with the direct object as the lower one.
The featural make-up of the two objects also proves crucial in disentangling the various experimentally uncovered aspects regarding their interaction e.g., differentially marked direct objects bear a [Person] feature and compete with the indirect object in valuing the person feature of the applicative. The feature specification is further refined function of the presence of clitic doubling or the lack thereof.
The experimental insights we gain into the syntax of Romanian ditransitives help us integrate them with their counterparts in Romance thereby contributing to a better cross-linguistic understanding of these constructions.