Nancy A. Combs
Fact-Finding Without Facts
Nancy A. Combs
Fact-Finding Without Facts
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This book explores international criminal fact-finding to reveal that the ability to determine who did what to whom in criminal trials is impaired.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Nancy A. CombsFact-Finding Without Facts49,99 €
- Angélica CardosoLimaThe Application of the Qualifying Fact of Feminicide26,99 €
- Kekionga PressCurious Facts about John Dillinger & J. Edgar Hoover13,99 €
- Jack Goldstein101 Amazing Facts about Jack the Ripper10,99 €
- 50 Facts Everyone Should Know about Crime & Punishment21,99 €
- Patrick R Freeman9/11 Overlooked Facts26,99 €
- Robert J. SullivanMurders without Bodies30,99 €
-
-
-
This book explores international criminal fact-finding to reveal that the ability to determine who did what to whom in criminal trials is impaired.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 434
- Erscheinungstermin: 7. Oktober 2010
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 778g
- ISBN-13: 9780521111157
- ISBN-10: 0521111153
- Artikelnr.: 31194122
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 434
- Erscheinungstermin: 7. Oktober 2010
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 235mm x 157mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 778g
- ISBN-13: 9780521111157
- ISBN-10: 0521111153
- Artikelnr.: 31194122
Nancy Amoury Combs is a Professor of Law at the William and Mary Law School, where she is the 2009-10 Cabell Research Professor and a 2008 recipient of William and Mary's Alumni Fellowship Award for teaching excellence. She earned her Ph.D. from Leiden University and her J.D. from the University of California at Berkeley School of Law. She has served as a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and to Justice Anthony Kennedy on the United States Supreme Court. Prior to joining the faculty at William and Mary Law School, Professor Combs served as legal advisor at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal in The Hague. She has written extensively on topics in international law and international criminal justice, publishing two books and numerous articles and essays appearing in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the Vanderbilt Law Review, the Hastings Law Journal, the American Journal of International Law, the Harvard International Law Journal, and the Chicago Journal of International Law, among others. She currently serves as member of the International Expert Framework, an international working group that is developing general rules and principles of international criminal procedure.
1. The evidence supporting international criminal convictions; 2. Questions
unanswered: international witnesses and the information unconveyed; 3. The
educational, linguistic, and cultural impediments to accurate fact-finding
at the international tribunals; 4. Of inconsistencies and their
explanations; 5. Perjury: the counter-narrative; 6. Expectations
unfulfilled: the consequences of the fact-finding impediments; 7. Casual
indifference: the trial chambers' treatment of testimonial deficiencies; 8.
Organizational liability revived: the pro-conviction bias explained; 9.
Help needed: practical suggestions and procedural reforms to improve
fact-finding accuracy; 10. Assessing the status quo: they are not doing
what they say they are doing but is what they are doing worth doing?; 11.
Conclusion.
unanswered: international witnesses and the information unconveyed; 3. The
educational, linguistic, and cultural impediments to accurate fact-finding
at the international tribunals; 4. Of inconsistencies and their
explanations; 5. Perjury: the counter-narrative; 6. Expectations
unfulfilled: the consequences of the fact-finding impediments; 7. Casual
indifference: the trial chambers' treatment of testimonial deficiencies; 8.
Organizational liability revived: the pro-conviction bias explained; 9.
Help needed: practical suggestions and procedural reforms to improve
fact-finding accuracy; 10. Assessing the status quo: they are not doing
what they say they are doing but is what they are doing worth doing?; 11.
Conclusion.
1. The evidence supporting international criminal convictions; 2. Questions
unanswered: international witnesses and the information unconveyed; 3. The
educational, linguistic, and cultural impediments to accurate fact-finding
at the international tribunals; 4. Of inconsistencies and their
explanations; 5. Perjury: the counter-narrative; 6. Expectations
unfulfilled: the consequences of the fact-finding impediments; 7. Casual
indifference: the trial chambers' treatment of testimonial deficiencies; 8.
Organizational liability revived: the pro-conviction bias explained; 9.
Help needed: practical suggestions and procedural reforms to improve
fact-finding accuracy; 10. Assessing the status quo: they are not doing
what they say they are doing but is what they are doing worth doing?; 11.
Conclusion.
unanswered: international witnesses and the information unconveyed; 3. The
educational, linguistic, and cultural impediments to accurate fact-finding
at the international tribunals; 4. Of inconsistencies and their
explanations; 5. Perjury: the counter-narrative; 6. Expectations
unfulfilled: the consequences of the fact-finding impediments; 7. Casual
indifference: the trial chambers' treatment of testimonial deficiencies; 8.
Organizational liability revived: the pro-conviction bias explained; 9.
Help needed: practical suggestions and procedural reforms to improve
fact-finding accuracy; 10. Assessing the status quo: they are not doing
what they say they are doing but is what they are doing worth doing?; 11.
Conclusion.