This pamphlet is meant for all adults, though primarily for women: it is a political manifesto for their social status. The author suggests that his sympathizers can, on short term, equalize the social status of all women to that of men; no matter whether all these women associate with the political left or right, with traditional or recent-alternative lifestyles. An obvious rebuttal to this suggestion is that feminism, in its multiple "waves", has already been trying hard to do this during the past half century. My obvious reply is that it not only pitifully failed, but managed to make matters worse due to its retrograde ideology, which focuses exclusively on high-status directive jobs instead of on all jobs. That also men are targeted, is because the realization of a gender-independent social status, if well implemented, implies an enormous boost for a country's economy. A reader might ask: in this case, isn't your conditional ("if well implemented") the hidden warrant of such economic success? No sir: "Good implementation" only refers to respecting the econometric laws of a healthy free market, where "healthy" implies the absence of monopolies and deep-state parasites. The US heavily fails on both accounts. Remember President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110?
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.