This volume provides an alternate history of health law by rewriting key judicial opinions from a feminist perspective. Leading scholars demonstrate how feminist analysis can transform law in a field where paternalism, stereotypes, and the public-private divide shape decisions about patient autonomy, coordination of care and health care financing.
This volume provides an alternate history of health law by rewriting key judicial opinions from a feminist perspective. Leading scholars demonstrate how feminist analysis can transform law in a field where paternalism, stereotypes, and the public-private divide shape decisions about patient autonomy, coordination of care and health care financing.
1. Introduction Seema Mohapatra and Lindsay F. Wiley; 2. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospitals, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914) Danielle Pelfrey Duryea and Kelly Dineen; 3. Reynolds v. McNichols, 488 F.2d 1378 (10th Cir. 1973) Aziza Ahmed and Wendy Parmet; 4. Conservatorship of Valerie N., 707 P.2d 760 (Cal. 1985) Cynthia Soohoo, Sofia Yakren and Doriane Lambelet Coleman; 5. Bouvia v. Superior Court, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Cal Ct. App. 1986) Joan H. Krause and Barry Furrow; 6. Moore v. Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) Jessica Roberts and Lisa C. Ikemoto; 7. Linton v. Commissioner of Health and Environment, 65 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 1995) Ruqaiijah Yearby and Gwendolyn Roberts Majette; 8. Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) Doron Dorfman and Becka Rich; 9. Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., 179 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 1999) Christina S. Ho and Valarie Blake; 10. Smith v. Rasmussen, 249 F.3d 755 (8th Cir. 2001) Heather Walter McCabe and Craig Konnoth; 11. Burton v. State, 49 So.3d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010) Greer Donley and Nadia Sawicki; 12. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012) Mary Ann Chirba, Alice A. Noble and Elizabeth Weeks; 13. Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 836 F.3d 643 (6th Cir. 2016) Maya Manian and Leslie C. Griffin; 14. Does v. Gillespie, 867 F. 3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2017) Elizabeth Kukura, Jennifer Oliva and Melissa Alexander; 15. National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S.Ct. 2361 (2018) Brietta R. Clark and Sonia Suter.
1. Introduction Seema Mohapatra and Lindsay F. Wiley; 2. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospitals, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914) Danielle Pelfrey Duryea and Kelly Dineen; 3. Reynolds v. McNichols, 488 F.2d 1378 (10th Cir. 1973) Aziza Ahmed and Wendy Parmet; 4. Conservatorship of Valerie N., 707 P.2d 760 (Cal. 1985) Cynthia Soohoo, Sofia Yakren and Doriane Lambelet Coleman; 5. Bouvia v. Superior Court, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Cal Ct. App. 1986) Joan H. Krause and Barry Furrow; 6. Moore v. Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) Jessica Roberts and Lisa C. Ikemoto; 7. Linton v. Commissioner of Health and Environment, 65 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 1995) Ruqaiijah Yearby and Gwendolyn Roberts Majette; 8. Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) Doron Dorfman and Becka Rich; 9. Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., 179 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 1999) Christina S. Ho and Valarie Blake; 10. Smith v. Rasmussen, 249 F.3d 755 (8th Cir. 2001) Heather Walter McCabe and Craig Konnoth; 11. Burton v. State, 49 So.3d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010) Greer Donley and Nadia Sawicki; 12. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012) Mary Ann Chirba, Alice A. Noble and Elizabeth Weeks; 13. Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 836 F.3d 643 (6th Cir. 2016) Maya Manian and Leslie C. Griffin; 14. Does v. Gillespie, 867 F. 3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2017) Elizabeth Kukura, Jennifer Oliva and Melissa Alexander; 15. National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S.Ct. 2361 (2018) Brietta R. Clark and Sonia Suter.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
