Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Tax Opinions
Herausgeber: Crawford, Bridget J.; Infanti, Anthony C.
Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Tax Opinions
Herausgeber: Crawford, Bridget J.; Infanti, Anthony C.
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Feminist scholars rewrite major tax decisions in order to illustrate the key role of viewpoint in statutory interpretation.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Feminist Judgments59,99 €
- Feminist Judgments: Reproductive Justice Rewritten62,99 €
- William PhelanGreat Judgments of the European Court of Justice40,99 €
- Rhetorical Processes and Legal Judgments34,99 €
- David Shank KerrReview of the Judgments of the Supreme Court in the Queen Vs. Joseph Chasson [microform]18,99 €
- Nancy E DowdFeminist Legal Theory32,99 €
- Anne Bottomley / Hilary Lim (eds.)Feminist Perspectives on Land Law112,99 €
-
-
-
Feminist scholars rewrite major tax decisions in order to illustrate the key role of viewpoint in statutory interpretation.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 362
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. März 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 20mm
- Gewicht: 524g
- ISBN-13: 9781316649596
- ISBN-10: 1316649598
- Artikelnr.: 48918455
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Books on Demand GmbH
- In de Tarpen 42
- 22848 Norderstedt
- info@bod.de
- 040 53433511
- Verlag: Cambridge University Press
- Seitenzahl: 362
- Erscheinungstermin: 22. März 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 229mm x 152mm x 20mm
- Gewicht: 524g
- ISBN-13: 9781316649596
- ISBN-10: 1316649598
- Artikelnr.: 48918455
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Books on Demand GmbH
- In de Tarpen 42
- 22848 Norderstedt
- info@bod.de
- 040 53433511
Part I. Introduction and Overview: 1. Introduction to the Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions Project Bridget J. Crawford and Anthony C. Infanti; 2. Feminist judging for substantive gender equality in tax law: changing international and comparative constitutional contexts Kathleen A. Lahey; Part II. The Feminist Judgments: 3. United States v. Rickert
188 US 432 (1903) Chloe Thompson and Grant Christensen; 4. Lucas v. Earl
281 U.S. 111 (1930) Francine J. Lipman and Ann Murphy; 5. Welch v. Helvering
290 US 111 (1933) Nicole Appleberry and Mary Louise Fellows; 6. United States v. Davis
370 US 65 (1962) Linda M. Beale and Patricia A. Cain; 7. Bob Jones University v. United States
461 US 574 (1983) Elaine Waterhouse Wilson and David A. Brennen; 8. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United States
75 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1985) Mildred Wigfall Robinson and Mary L. Heen; 9. Estate of Clack
106 T.C. 131 (1996) Goldburn P. Maynard
Jr and Wendy C. Gerzog; 10. Cheshire v. Commissioner
115 T.C. 183 (2000)
aff'd
282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2002) Michelle L. Drumbl and Danshera Cords; 11. Magdalin v. Commissioner
96 T.C.M. (CCH) 491 (2008)
aff'd
2010-1 US Tax Cas. (CCH) 50
150 (1st Cir. 2009) Katherine Pratt and Jennifer Bird-Pollan; 12. O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner
134 T.C. 34 (2010)
acq.
2011-47 I.R.B. 789 (Nov. 21
2011) Nancy J. Knauer and David B. Cruz; 13. United States v. Windsor
133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) Allison Anna Tait and Ruthann Robson.
188 US 432 (1903) Chloe Thompson and Grant Christensen; 4. Lucas v. Earl
281 U.S. 111 (1930) Francine J. Lipman and Ann Murphy; 5. Welch v. Helvering
290 US 111 (1933) Nicole Appleberry and Mary Louise Fellows; 6. United States v. Davis
370 US 65 (1962) Linda M. Beale and Patricia A. Cain; 7. Bob Jones University v. United States
461 US 574 (1983) Elaine Waterhouse Wilson and David A. Brennen; 8. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United States
75 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1985) Mildred Wigfall Robinson and Mary L. Heen; 9. Estate of Clack
106 T.C. 131 (1996) Goldburn P. Maynard
Jr and Wendy C. Gerzog; 10. Cheshire v. Commissioner
115 T.C. 183 (2000)
aff'd
282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2002) Michelle L. Drumbl and Danshera Cords; 11. Magdalin v. Commissioner
96 T.C.M. (CCH) 491 (2008)
aff'd
2010-1 US Tax Cas. (CCH) 50
150 (1st Cir. 2009) Katherine Pratt and Jennifer Bird-Pollan; 12. O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner
134 T.C. 34 (2010)
acq.
2011-47 I.R.B. 789 (Nov. 21
2011) Nancy J. Knauer and David B. Cruz; 13. United States v. Windsor
133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) Allison Anna Tait and Ruthann Robson.
Part I. Introduction and Overview: 1. Introduction to the Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions Project Bridget J. Crawford and Anthony C. Infanti; 2. Feminist judging for substantive gender equality in tax law: changing international and comparative constitutional contexts Kathleen A. Lahey; Part II. The Feminist Judgments: 3. United States v. Rickert
188 US 432 (1903) Chloe Thompson and Grant Christensen; 4. Lucas v. Earl
281 U.S. 111 (1930) Francine J. Lipman and Ann Murphy; 5. Welch v. Helvering
290 US 111 (1933) Nicole Appleberry and Mary Louise Fellows; 6. United States v. Davis
370 US 65 (1962) Linda M. Beale and Patricia A. Cain; 7. Bob Jones University v. United States
461 US 574 (1983) Elaine Waterhouse Wilson and David A. Brennen; 8. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United States
75 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1985) Mildred Wigfall Robinson and Mary L. Heen; 9. Estate of Clack
106 T.C. 131 (1996) Goldburn P. Maynard
Jr and Wendy C. Gerzog; 10. Cheshire v. Commissioner
115 T.C. 183 (2000)
aff'd
282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2002) Michelle L. Drumbl and Danshera Cords; 11. Magdalin v. Commissioner
96 T.C.M. (CCH) 491 (2008)
aff'd
2010-1 US Tax Cas. (CCH) 50
150 (1st Cir. 2009) Katherine Pratt and Jennifer Bird-Pollan; 12. O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner
134 T.C. 34 (2010)
acq.
2011-47 I.R.B. 789 (Nov. 21
2011) Nancy J. Knauer and David B. Cruz; 13. United States v. Windsor
133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) Allison Anna Tait and Ruthann Robson.
188 US 432 (1903) Chloe Thompson and Grant Christensen; 4. Lucas v. Earl
281 U.S. 111 (1930) Francine J. Lipman and Ann Murphy; 5. Welch v. Helvering
290 US 111 (1933) Nicole Appleberry and Mary Louise Fellows; 6. United States v. Davis
370 US 65 (1962) Linda M. Beale and Patricia A. Cain; 7. Bob Jones University v. United States
461 US 574 (1983) Elaine Waterhouse Wilson and David A. Brennen; 8. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United States
75 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1985) Mildred Wigfall Robinson and Mary L. Heen; 9. Estate of Clack
106 T.C. 131 (1996) Goldburn P. Maynard
Jr and Wendy C. Gerzog; 10. Cheshire v. Commissioner
115 T.C. 183 (2000)
aff'd
282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2002) Michelle L. Drumbl and Danshera Cords; 11. Magdalin v. Commissioner
96 T.C.M. (CCH) 491 (2008)
aff'd
2010-1 US Tax Cas. (CCH) 50
150 (1st Cir. 2009) Katherine Pratt and Jennifer Bird-Pollan; 12. O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner
134 T.C. 34 (2010)
acq.
2011-47 I.R.B. 789 (Nov. 21
2011) Nancy J. Knauer and David B. Cruz; 13. United States v. Windsor
133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) Allison Anna Tait and Ruthann Robson.