Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Property Opinions
Herausgeber: Rodriguez-Dod, Eloisa C.; Marty-Nelson, Elena Maria
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Part I. Introduction: 1. Introduction to the feminist judgments: Rewritten property opinions project; 2. Property law revolution
devolution
and feminist legal theory; 3. Incorporating feminist perspectives throughout law school curriculum; Part II. Allocation of Rights: 4. Johnson v. M'Intosh
21 U.S. 543 (1823); 5. Botiller v. Dominguez
130 U.S. 238 (1889); 6. Pierson v. Post
3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805); Part III. Patents
Publicity Rights
and Trademarks: 7. Association for molecular pathology v. Myriad Genetics
Inc.
569 U.S. 576 (2013); 8. White v. Samsung electronics America
Inc.
971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992); Part IV. Condemnation and Adverse Possession: 9. Kelo v. City of New London
Connecticut
545 U.S. 469 (2005); 10. Tate v. water works and sewer board of the City of Oxford
217 So. 3d 906 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); Part V. Gifts and Future Interests: 11. Gruen v. Gruen
496 N.E.2d 869 (N.Y. 1986); Part VI. Tenancy in Common
Joint Tenancy
and Tenancy by the Entirety: 12. Sawada v. Endo
561 P.2d 1291 (Haw. 1977); 13. Taylor v. Canterbury
92 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2004); 14. Coggan v. Coggan
239 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1970); Part VII. Exclusionary Zoning: 15. Moore v. City of East Cleveland
Ohio
431 U.S. 494 (1977); Part VIII. Evictions: 16. Phillips neighborhood housing trust v. Brown
564 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997); 17. Blake v. Stradford
725 N.Y.S.2d 189 (Dist. Ct. 2001); Part IX. Landlord-tenant Premises Liability: 18. Bartley v. Sweetser
890 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1994); Index.
