Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The politics behind U.S. environmental foreign policy on climate change]( "The politics behind U.S. environmental foreign policy on climate change")
The politics behind U.S. environmental foreign policy on climate change17,95 €![U.S. Refugee and Foreign Policy from the 1930s to 1945]( "U.S. Refugee and Foreign Policy from the 1930s to 1945")
U.S. Refugee and Foreign Policy from the 1930s to 194515,95 €![Indian perceptions - From 15th century to Benjamin Franklin´s]( "Indian perceptions - From 15th century to Benjamin Franklin´s")
Indian perceptions - From 15th century to Benjamin Franklin´s "Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America"15,95 €![Francis Daniel Pastorius and his image of America in the late 17th century]( "Francis Daniel Pastorius and his image of America in the late 17th century")
Francis Daniel Pastorius and his image of America in the late 17th century17,95 €![The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran]( "The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran")
The Exercise of Soft Power ¿ U.S. Self-Imaging in International Broadcasting to Iran67,75 €![John Dos Passos´s]( "John Dos Passos´s")
John Dos Passos´s "The Big Money": Critical Perceptions of the United States during the 1920s17,95 €![Exploring secondary school English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' attitudes to and perceptions of using the internet in English language teaching in Benin]( "Exploring secondary school English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' attitudes to and perceptions of using the internet in English language teaching in Benin")
Exploring secondary school English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' attitudes to and perceptions of using the internet in English language teaching in Benin52,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject American Studies - Miscellaneous, grade: 1,3, Free University of Berlin (John F. Kennedy Institut), course: Rise to Power: US Foreign Policy in the 20th Century, language: English, abstract: No area seems to be of more importance in the field of foreign policy and diplomatic history today than the so called Middle East. The continuing clashes between Israeli forces and Palestinian suicide bombers, the difficult challenge of stabilizing a newly elected government in Iraq and the growing tension between Iran and the international community concerning the issue of nuclear power are just a few examples which illustrate the urgency to look at origins of these conflicts. As an example for this essay, I have chosen the case of Iran. I will focus on the very beginning of the involvement of the United States in the Middle East, and I will demonstrate what kind of issues and perceptions played an essential role in the determination of U.S. policy towards Iran. Although I do not attempt to find causes for the current situation, some of the factors I will identify in this essay might also serve as an explanation for the current conflict with Iran. Yet, this is not my primary intention and further research and empirical data will be required to investigate connections to the contemporary situation with Iran.However, I will argue that the way US policymakers viewed their Iranian counterparts did not change fundamentally for many decades at least regarding the country of Iran if not more countries in the Middle East. I downplay this aspect because a lot more research is needed to support this argument and it would extend beyond the scope of this essay. Mostly the dealings with Iran and its premier Muhammad Musaddiq in the early 1950s at the time of the Anglo-Iranian oil crises will be of relevance. The essence of my argument is that even though strategic thinking and the fear of a communist takeover of Iran played a role in negotiating with Iran, the reason why Musaddiq was toppled by the CIA and the British MI-6 was because Western diplomats had a so called "orientalist" mindset and perceived him as too weak and irrational as to fight off Soviet attacks and propaganda which could have led to an eventual takeover of Iran by Soviet forces. In order to pre-empt that, the United States and Britain collaborated to bring down Musaddiq and install a shah regime that would, on the one hand be more favourable to Western oil interests, and on the other hand more resistant regarding possible Soviet invasion efforts.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.