Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Writing Center as Cultural and Interdisciplinary Contact Zone]( "The Writing Center as Cultural and Interdisciplinary Contact Zone")
The Writing Center as Cultural and Interdisciplinary Contact Zone43,99 €![Testing The Matrix Language Frame Model: Data From French-lingala]( "Testing The Matrix Language Frame Model: Data From French-lingala")
Testing The Matrix Language Frame Model: Data From French-lingala43,99 €![Towards a Better Understanding of Metonymy]( "Towards a Better Understanding of Metonymy")
Towards a Better Understanding of Metonymy71,95 €![A Reading of Literary Space in Contemporary Fiction]( "A Reading of Literary Space in Contemporary Fiction")
A Reading of Literary Space in Contemporary Fiction17,99 €![The language of contemporary judicial discourse as a semiological system]( "The language of contemporary judicial discourse as a semiological system")
The language of contemporary judicial discourse as a semiological system46,99 €![Interpreter-Mediated Interactions of the Courtroom]( "Interpreter-Mediated Interactions of the Courtroom")
Interpreter-Mediated Interactions of the Courtroom72,45 €![Eine Lektüre des literarischen Raums in der zeitgenössischen Belletristik]( "Eine Lektüre des literarischen Raums in der zeitgenössischen Belletristik")
Eine Lektüre des literarischen Raums in der zeitgenössischen Belletristik23,90 €
The writing center (WC) interaction is one of the
least researched interactional situations even though
it has become an important academic context which has
a sizable impact on students learning. This study
applies the concepts of frame (Goffman, 1974) and contextualization cues (Gumperz, 1982) to the
discourse analysis of volubility (turn length and
distribution) and questions (question types and
frequencies) used in university WC interactions
involving native (NS) and nonnative speakers (NNS) of
English. In actual WC practices, the collaborative
frame described in the by-now-traditional WC theory
influenced by social constructionism, the tutor s
frame, and the student s frame intertwine, and they
may often conflict with each other. The
research results reflect a gap between the
collaborative frame defined in the WC
theory and the actual WC practices, and suggest a
more flexible and realistic tutor training and
tutorial method to narrow the gap. Students and
scholars who are interested in discourse analysis,
second language acquisition, and/or WC practices in
universities will find this book useful.
least researched interactional situations even though
it has become an important academic context which has
a sizable impact on students learning. This study
applies the concepts of frame (Goffman, 1974) and contextualization cues (Gumperz, 1982) to the
discourse analysis of volubility (turn length and
distribution) and questions (question types and
frequencies) used in university WC interactions
involving native (NS) and nonnative speakers (NNS) of
English. In actual WC practices, the collaborative
frame described in the by-now-traditional WC theory
influenced by social constructionism, the tutor s
frame, and the student s frame intertwine, and they
may often conflict with each other. The
research results reflect a gap between the
collaborative frame defined in the WC
theory and the actual WC practices, and suggest a
more flexible and realistic tutor training and
tutorial method to narrow the gap. Students and
scholars who are interested in discourse analysis,
second language acquisition, and/or WC practices in
universities will find this book useful.