Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Ethno-religious Conflict and Education in Nigeria]( "Ethno-religious Conflict and Education in Nigeria")
Ethno-religious Conflict and Education in Nigeria17,99 €![The Ethno-Narcotic Politics of the Shan People]( "The Ethno-Narcotic Politics of the Shan People")
The Ethno-Narcotic Politics of the Shan People129,99 €![Imagining for Real]( "Imagining for Real")
Imagining for Real205,99 €![Ethno-Archaeology in Jenné, Mali]( "Ethno-Archaeology in Jenné, Mali")
Ethno-Archaeology in Jenné, Mali87,99 €![Ethno-Archaeology and its Transfers]( "Ethno-Archaeology and its Transfers")
Ethno-Archaeology and its Transfers74,99 €![Ethno-Baroque]( "Ethno-Baroque")
Ethno-Baroque146,99 €![Children, Media and Playground Cultures]( "Children, Media and Playground Cultures")
Children, Media and Playground Cultures41,99 €
The 2002 Miss World pageant scheduled to take place
in Nigeria turned into a
controversial event, especially after a local
newspaper published a blasphemous article
about the Prophet Muhammad. How this controversy was
framed in the op-ed pages of
eight selected Nigerian newspapers was the first
focus of this study. Using framing
analysis approach, the study identified the key
frames that were employed by these
newspapers in their narratives about ethnicity,
religion, and gender the central issues
around which the controversy revolved. A second focus
of the study was the evaluation
of the selected newspapers performance based on the
social responsibility theory of the
press. The results of the study indicated that the
selected newspapers were complicit in
perpetuating the controversy due to their engagement
in regional, ethnic and religious
activism. Therefore, the study concluded that the
selected newspapers behaved
irresponsibly because of their failure to fulfill the
ethical tenets of the social
responsibility theory of the press.
in Nigeria turned into a
controversial event, especially after a local
newspaper published a blasphemous article
about the Prophet Muhammad. How this controversy was
framed in the op-ed pages of
eight selected Nigerian newspapers was the first
focus of this study. Using framing
analysis approach, the study identified the key
frames that were employed by these
newspapers in their narratives about ethnicity,
religion, and gender the central issues
around which the controversy revolved. A second focus
of the study was the evaluation
of the selected newspapers performance based on the
social responsibility theory of the
press. The results of the study indicated that the
selected newspapers were complicit in
perpetuating the controversy due to their engagement
in regional, ethnic and religious
activism. Therefore, the study concluded that the
selected newspapers behaved
irresponsibly because of their failure to fulfill the
ethical tenets of the social
responsibility theory of the press.