Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Global Human Rights Institutions]( "Global Human Rights Institutions")
Global Human Rights Institutions82,99 €![Revisiting the Potential and Limitations of Security Institutions]( "Revisiting the Potential and Limitations of Security Institutions")
Revisiting the Potential and Limitations of Security Institutions38,99 €![Political Institutions and Democracy in the Dominican Republic]( "Political Institutions and Democracy in the Dominican Republic")
Political Institutions and Democracy in the Dominican Republic51,99 €![The Nigerian State And Institutions]( "The Nigerian State And Institutions")
The Nigerian State And Institutions51,99 €![Institutions of Direct Democracy and Happiness]( "Institutions of Direct Democracy and Happiness")
Institutions of Direct Democracy and Happiness32,99 €![Political Institutions for an EU Federal Constitutional Treaty]( "Political Institutions for an EU Federal Constitutional Treaty")
Political Institutions for an EU Federal Constitutional Treaty32,99 €![The Importance of Constitutional Rules and Property Rights]( "The Importance of Constitutional Rules and Property Rights")
The Importance of Constitutional Rules and Property Rights59,95 €
Thomas Pogge has famously argued that the present
arrangement
of international institutions that allows for human
rights violations
to occur on an ongoing basis is unjust, and further,
that powerful
states that create and maintain these institutions
are responsible for
the resulting human rights violations. Pogge
concludes that this
implication of responsibility creates a moral
requirement for
powerful nations to take immediate steps to reform
the global
institutional order in such a way as to minimize the
number of
foreseeable human rights violations that occur within it.
I believe that Pogge is only partly correct in his
analysis. In this
book, I outline my argument that the global
institutional order is not
"unjust" as Pogge suggests. However, even if the
maintenance of
these institutions does not constitute an injustice,
I conclude that
that there remains an important sense in which
powerful states that
support the present arrangement of international
institutions are
responsible for ongoing subsistence rights
violations, and thus have
a strong moral responsibility to support
institutional remedies for
systematic human rights violations.
arrangement
of international institutions that allows for human
rights violations
to occur on an ongoing basis is unjust, and further,
that powerful
states that create and maintain these institutions
are responsible for
the resulting human rights violations. Pogge
concludes that this
implication of responsibility creates a moral
requirement for
powerful nations to take immediate steps to reform
the global
institutional order in such a way as to minimize the
number of
foreseeable human rights violations that occur within it.
I believe that Pogge is only partly correct in his
analysis. In this
book, I outline my argument that the global
institutional order is not
"unjust" as Pogge suggests. However, even if the
maintenance of
these institutions does not constitute an injustice,
I conclude that
that there remains an important sense in which
powerful states that
support the present arrangement of international
institutions are
responsible for ongoing subsistence rights
violations, and thus have
a strong moral responsibility to support
institutional remedies for
systematic human rights violations.