Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![A Comparison of Horizontal Cloud-To-Ground Lightning Flash Distance Using Weather Surveillance Radar and the Distance Between Successive Flashes Met]( "A Comparison of Horizontal Cloud-To-Ground Lightning Flash Distance Using Weather Surveillance Radar and the Distance Between Successive Flashes Met")
A Comparison of Horizontal Cloud-To-Ground Lightning Flash Distance Using Weather Surveillance Radar and the Distance Between Successive Flashes Met60,99 €![Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca]( "Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca")
Low Frequency Radar Systems Should Replace Current High Frequency Radar Systems on the Battlefield to Optimize the Army's Ground Surveillance Radar Ca61,99 €![Ground Surveillance and Control Elements of the Tactical Air Control System (Tacs) with Modular Control Equipment]( "Ground Surveillance and Control Elements of the Tactical Air Control System (Tacs) with Modular Control Equipment")
Ground Surveillance and Control Elements of the Tactical Air Control System (Tacs) with Modular Control Equipment60,99 €![LT Gen Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment]( "LT Gen Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment")
LT Gen Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment60,99 €![Lt. Gen. Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment]( "Lt. Gen. Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment")
Lt. Gen. Ned Almond, USA: A Ground Commander's Conflicting View with Airmen Over Cas Doctrine and Employment60,99 €![Centralized Cooperative Control for Route Surveillance with Constant Communication]( "Centralized Cooperative Control for Route Surveillance with Constant Communication")
Centralized Cooperative Control for Route Surveillance with Constant Communication60,99 €![Beyond Afghanistan: Effective Combined Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Operations]( "Beyond Afghanistan: Effective Combined Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Operations")
Beyond Afghanistan: Effective Combined Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Operations60,99 €
Given the nature of the international environment and the proliferation of communist-inspired and other insurgency movements, one cannot preclude United States involvement in stability operations in an insurgency environment. It is, consequently, incumbent on the military commander to fully understand the nature of such operations. In a situation in which his forces are usually isolated, the loyalty of the surrounding indigenous population is indeterminable, and friendly units are frequently overextended in zone, the need for timely and accurate intelligence is vital. Operating base and logistic installation defense are of particular concern in an insurgency environment since friendly forces are most highly vulnerable to harassing artillery, mortar and rocket fire, espionage, sabotage and intermittent surprise ground attack. This paper investigates whether current United States Army combat surveillance doctrine available to the maneuver battalion responsible for base security in stability operations is valid. Applicatory and doctrinal aspects of combat surveillance are investigated using the historical research approach. The investigation concludes that current doctrine is invalid. The study provides the necessary introspection upon which a proposed battalion ground surveillance plan can be constructed. The proposed plan is intended to rectify the inadequacies discovered in current combat surveillance doctrine for use in stability operations.