Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Extraordinary renditions in Guantanamo Bay]( "Extraordinary renditions in Guantanamo Bay")
Extraordinary renditions in Guantanamo Bay15,95 €![Presidential Rhetoric on Terrorism under Bush, Obama and Trump]( "Presidential Rhetoric on Terrorism under Bush, Obama and Trump")
Presidential Rhetoric on Terrorism under Bush, Obama and Trump44,99 €![Historic Documents of 2020]( "Historic Documents of 2020")
Historic Documents of 2020401,99 €![The Geneva Conventions Under Assault, The]( "The Geneva Conventions Under Assault, The")
The Geneva Conventions Under Assault, The42,99 €![Terrorism: Commentary on Security Documents Volume 146]( "Terrorism: Commentary on Security Documents Volume 146")
Terrorism: Commentary on Security Documents Volume 146187,99 €![The Leasing of Guantanamo Bay]( "The Leasing of Guantanamo Bay")
The Leasing of Guantanamo Bay86,99 €![The Life and Administration of Robert Banks, Second Earl of Liverpool, K. G., Late First Lord of the Treasury: Comp. From Original Documents]( "The Life and Administration of Robert Banks, Second Earl of Liverpool, K. G., Late First Lord of the Treasury: Comp. From Original Documents")
The Life and Administration of Robert Banks, Second Earl of Liverpool, K. G., Late First Lord of the Treasury: Comp. From Original Documents42,99 €
High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Initially the Bush Presidency asserted that they did not have to release any of the Guantanamo captive's documents. They asserted that no captive apprehended in Afghanistan was entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention, and that those held in the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base were not protected by US law either, because it was not on US territory. This position was widely criticized, and was challenged in the United States's Judicial System, with several cases eventually being heard before the Supreme Court of the United States. In Rasul v. Bush the Supreme Court over-ruled the Executive Branch, and clarified that the United States District Courts had jurisdiction to hear detainees' suits for writs of habeas corpus. By September 2007 Eleven official lists have been released. Many captives names were spelled inconsistently on these lists.