We often rely on others for guidance about what to do. But wouldn't it be better to rely instead on only our own judgment? Eric Wiland argues that we can accept moral testimony without loss, that there are several distinctive social goods attainable by being guided by others, and that sometimes taking another's advice is the only way to act well.
We often rely on others for guidance about what to do. But wouldn't it be better to rely instead on only our own judgment? Eric Wiland argues that we can accept moral testimony without loss, that there are several distinctive social goods attainable by being guided by others, and that sometimes taking another's advice is the only way to act well.
Eric Wiland is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Missouri - St. Louis, author of Reasons (2012), and organizes the St. Louis Annual Conference on Reasons and Rationality (SLACRR).
Inhaltsangabe
1: Accepting Moral Testimony 2: Epistemic Problems of Moral Testimony 3: Moral Testimony and the Value of Moral Understanding 4: Autonomy and Moral Testimony: A Threat? 5: Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Solidarity 6: The Nature of Advice 7: Advising Duos and Join Agency
1: Accepting Moral Testimony 2: Epistemic Problems of Moral Testimony 3: Moral Testimony and the Value of Moral Understanding 4: Autonomy and Moral Testimony: A Threat? 5: Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Solidarity 6: The Nature of Advice 7: Advising Duos and Join Agency
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309