Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes]( "Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes")
Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes95,99 €![Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes]( "Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes")
Internet Use and Protest in Malaysia and other Authoritarian Regimes95,99 €![The Tragic Destiny of Authoritarian Regimes]( "The Tragic Destiny of Authoritarian Regimes")
The Tragic Destiny of Authoritarian Regimes17,99 €![Opposing Trends of Labor Protests in Cambodia and China. Do High-Capacity Authoritarian Regimes Create More Space for Institutional Arrangements?]( "Opposing Trends of Labor Protests in Cambodia and China. Do High-Capacity Authoritarian Regimes Create More Space for Institutional Arrangements?")
Opposing Trends of Labor Protests in Cambodia and China. Do High-Capacity Authoritarian Regimes Create More Space for Institutional Arrangements?17,95 €![Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America]( "Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America")
Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America151,99 €![What Do We Know and What Should We Do About Authoritarian Regimes?]( "What Do We Know and What Should We Do About Authoritarian Regimes?")
What Do We Know and What Should We Do About Authoritarian Regimes?56,99 €![Elite Rivalry, Mass Killing and Genocide in Authoritarian Regimes]( "Elite Rivalry, Mass Killing and Genocide in Authoritarian Regimes")
Elite Rivalry, Mass Killing and Genocide in Authoritarian Regimes170,99 €
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2018 in the subject Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict, Security, grade: 2,0, University of Constance, language: English, abstract: This study investigates whether there is a significant impact of different authoritarian regimes, namely personalist and nonpersonalist civilian autocracies as well as their respective military counterparts, on the termination of civil war. The paper suggests that in civil wars those regimes that function on a civilian basis have an advantage in co-opting their opponents to reach a settlement of the conflict. Furthermore, military leaders are expected to be less reluctant towards the use of force than civilian ones which should make them more likely to win civil wars. The same applies to personalist dictators who are hypothesised to view the state as their own and are inclined to forcefully defend their achievements. Several multinomial logit models are tested for the time period between 1946 and 2010. The average predicted probabilities show that personalist civilian regimes indeed are more likely to reach a settlement than other types. Nonpersonalist civilian dictatorships are correctly hypothesised to least likely win an intra-state war, whereas personalist military leaders do so with a comparatively high probability.