How Europeans Understand Solidarity, Reciprocity and Fairness in the EU

Insights from Conversations Among Citizens
Herausgeber: Egner, Bjorn; Steffek, Jens; Heinelt, Hubert

• Gebundenes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

This edited book sheds new light on the understanding of solidarity, reciprocity and fairness from the perspective of European Union (EU) citizens and with this, how cohesion in the EU can be achieved.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Seitenzahl: 242
• Erscheinungstermin: 28. Juni 2024
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 234mm x 156mm
• Gewicht: 625g
• ISBN-13: 9781032665764
• ISBN-10: 1032665769
• Artikelnr.: 70150487

Autorenporträt

Björn Egner is Adjunct Professor at the Institute of Political Science, TU Darmstadt, Germany. Hubert Heinelt is Professor at the Institute of Political Science, TU Darmstadt, Germany (formally retired since April 2018). Jens Steffek is Professor at the Institute of Political Science, TU Darmstadt, Germany.

Inhaltsangabe

1. Introduction 2. Cohesion, solidarity, fairness and reciprocity:
Clarifying the concepts in the EU context 3. Exploring how Europeans
understand solidarity in the EU: A focus group approach 4. Finland: "We
should not get help either if we're in a shitty situation and we've put
ourselves there" 5. Germany: "We profit if the EU, if other countries are
doing well" 6. The Netherlands: A "small frog country", but also the "best
boy in class"? 7. Greece: "What it should be? It should be everybody giving
and everybody helping" 8. Portugal: "We are living at the expense of
European funds but these funds have been misused" 9. Spain: A second class
country lagging behind Europe: "The better Europe does, the better Spain
will do" 10. Latvia: "We should stand strongly together and support each
other as much as we can" 11. Lithuania: Consistently pro-European but still
"a bit of a scrooge" 12. Slovakia: "Why should we save their ass, when it's
their own fault?" 13. Solidarity in the European Union: Results of
comparative analysis of the focus group discussions 14. National storylines
and topoi found in the focus group discussions 15. Conclusion