Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Selfie Citizenship]( "Selfie Citizenship")
Selfie Citizenship41,99 €![Die Hochwasserkatastrophe 2002 in Sachsen]( "Die Hochwasserkatastrophe 2002 in Sachsen")
Die Hochwasserkatastrophe 2002 in Sachsen42,00 €![A Psychological Treatment to Facilitate Recovery in Early Psychosis]( "A Psychological Treatment to Facilitate Recovery in Early Psychosis")
A Psychological Treatment to Facilitate Recovery in Early Psychosis32,99 €![Psychological Eustress: An Exploratory Regulated Process]( "Psychological Eustress: An Exploratory Regulated Process")
Psychological Eustress: An Exploratory Regulated Process38,99 €![Neurofeedback and HRV Biofeedback after Stroke]( "Neurofeedback and HRV Biofeedback after Stroke")
Neurofeedback and HRV Biofeedback after Stroke32,99 €![Movement Therapy Techniques and Therapeutic Holding With Children]( "Movement Therapy Techniques and Therapeutic Holding With Children")
Movement Therapy Techniques and Therapeutic Holding With Children32,99 €![Out of control sexual behavior]( "Out of control sexual behavior")
Out of control sexual behavior51,99 €
The Hungarian elections in 2002 serve as delicacy not
only for political scientists, but also for all kinds
of social scientists. The theory of rational choice
is not enough in itself to explain the results of the
two rounds. The role of emotions and
symbols represented in the theory of symbolic
politics seems to be unavoidable in the analysis.
There are two common features of the two-round
elections all around the world: the participation is
higher in the first round, and in the second one
people tend to vote for the party that seems to be
winning. Contrary to these tendencies in the
Hungarian case, although the participation was very
high in the first round, it was even higher in the
second one, and the party that seemed to be losing
the whole election at the end of the first round was
the winner of the second one. What happened between
the two rounds? Political scientists can explain this
phenomenon with a new campaign method which used
emotions and national symbols and activated
previously uncertain voters. This work presents a
case of voting behaviour when people do not have
enough information to decide, thus they use their
emotions as information.
only for political scientists, but also for all kinds
of social scientists. The theory of rational choice
is not enough in itself to explain the results of the
two rounds. The role of emotions and
symbols represented in the theory of symbolic
politics seems to be unavoidable in the analysis.
There are two common features of the two-round
elections all around the world: the participation is
higher in the first round, and in the second one
people tend to vote for the party that seems to be
winning. Contrary to these tendencies in the
Hungarian case, although the participation was very
high in the first round, it was even higher in the
second one, and the party that seemed to be losing
the whole election at the end of the first round was
the winner of the second one. What happened between
the two rounds? Political scientists can explain this
phenomenon with a new campaign method which used
emotions and national symbols and activated
previously uncertain voters. This work presents a
case of voting behaviour when people do not have
enough information to decide, thus they use their
emotions as information.