Improving America's Schools Together
How District-University Partnerships and Continuous Improvement Can Transform Education
Herausgeber: Biag, Manuelito; Imig, David G.; Gomez, Louis M.
Improving America's Schools Together
How District-University Partnerships and Continuous Improvement Can Transform Education
Herausgeber: Biag, Manuelito; Imig, David G.; Gomez, Louis M.
- Gebundenes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
The first definitive text on continuous improvement in school district-university partnerships, covering improvement methods, theory, research, and real cases across the country with practical improvement tools that can be adapted to any setting.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Improving America's Schools Together42,99 €
- Improvement Science in the Field108,99 €
- Improvement Science in the Field42,99 €
- R. Murray ThomasViolence in America's Schools66,99 €
- Kelly WachelParents and Schools Together64,99 €
- Smita GuhaTeacher as Researcher115,99 €
- Nancy E. BaileyLosing America's Schools43,99 €
-
-
-
The first definitive text on continuous improvement in school district-university partnerships, covering improvement methods, theory, research, and real cases across the country with practical improvement tools that can be adapted to any setting.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Globe Pequot Publishing Group Inc/Bloomsbury
- Seitenzahl: 382
- Erscheinungstermin: 5. Mai 2023
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 260mm x 183mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 912g
- ISBN-13: 9781538173213
- ISBN-10: 1538173212
- Artikelnr.: 66872863
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Books on Demand GmbH
- In de Tarpen 42
- 22848 Norderstedt
- info@bod.de
- 040 53433511
- Verlag: Globe Pequot Publishing Group Inc/Bloomsbury
- Seitenzahl: 382
- Erscheinungstermin: 5. Mai 2023
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 260mm x 183mm x 25mm
- Gewicht: 912g
- ISBN-13: 9781538173213
- ISBN-10: 1538173212
- Artikelnr.: 66872863
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Books on Demand GmbH
- In de Tarpen 42
- 22848 Norderstedt
- info@bod.de
- 040 53433511
Contributors Erin Anderson, Douglas W. Anthony, Cynthia K. Barron, Carole Basile, Michelle M. Beavers, Barnett Berry, Manuelito Biag, Regina Biggs, Anthony S. Bryk, Susan Carlile, Charoscar Coleman, Diana Cornejo-Sanchez, Shelby Cosner, Kathleen M.W. Cunningham, Kris DeFilippis, Mark E. Deschaine, Felice Desouza, David Eddy-Spicer, Segun Eubanks, Christina Flesher, Louis Gomez, Betsy Hargrove, Marni Herrington, Brian Harvey, Zipporah Hightower, Randy Hitz, David Imig, Janice Jackson, Julia Jacobsen, Kara Libby, Sandra Lochhead, Peter Martinez, David Mayrowetz, Tania McKey, Peter Moyi, Christine M. Neumerski, Margaret Terry Orr, Deborah S. Peterson, Meisha Porter, Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Natasha Saunders, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Claire Silva, Denise A. Soares, Jean Snell, Elizabeth Leisy Stosich, Steve Tozer, Samantha Viano, Sam Whalen, Tinkhani Ushe White, Paige Whitlock, Paul Zavitkovsky About the Editors Louis Gomez is professor of education (and of information studies) at the University of California, Los Angeles. Gomez has served since 2008 as a senior fellow at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, where he leads the Network Development work. Beginning in 2009, he held the Helen S. Faison Chair in Urban Education at the University of Pittsburgh, where he was also director of the Center for Urban Education and a senior scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center. From 2001 to 2008, he held several faculty appointments at Northwestern University, including the Aon Chair in the Learning Sciences at the School of Education and Social Policy. Prior to joining academia, he spent fourteen years working in cognitive science and person-computer systems and interactions at Bell Laboratories, Bell Communications Research Inc., and Bellcore. His research interests have encompassed the application of computing and networking technology to teaching and learning, applied cognitive science, human-computer interactions, and other areas. Manuelito Biag currently serves as the managing director of the Carnegie Foundation's Center for Postsecondary Innovation. His interests include design thinking, research-practice partnerships, educational leadership, and networked improvement science. Manuelito comes to Carnegie from Stanford University, where he served as senior researcher at the John W. Gardner Center for Youth and their Communities at the Graduate School of Education. His work, which has been presented in community forums, professional conferences, and published in academic journals, policy briefs, and edited volumes, examines the organizational structures, policies, and programs that influence students' learning and overall development-particularly those from vulnerable and historically-marginalized backgrounds. David Imig holds emeritus status from the Teaching and Learning, Policy and Leadership program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He studies and writes in the area of school leader preparation and teacher education policy and practice. He served as president and chief executive officer of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE) from 1980-2005. He is past chair of the National Policy Board for Educational Administration, the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education's Executive Committee and the National Society for the Study of Education. He was a senior associate for the National Network for Educational Renewal and helped to establish the Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED), serving as chair of the Board of Directors from 2010-2020. He has taught and directed dissertations in the cohort EdD program at Maryland for aspiring school leaders. He serves as a senior fellow for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and is co-leader of the Improvement Leadership Education for the Advancement of Teaching (iLEAD). He is the recipient of a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Universities Council for the Education of Teachers in the UK. Dr. Randy Hitz is Dean Emeritus of the Graduate School of Education at Portland State University. His higher education administrative experience spans three decades and includes positions at Portland State, the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and Montana State University. He also served in the Oregon Department of Education as the Early Childhood Education Specialist where he led the effort to create Oregon's State Prekindergarten Program. His teaching experience ranges from preschool to graduate school. Dr. Hitz' publications focus primarily on educational policy and curriculum and he has addressed policy matters directly through serving on and leading a variety of state and national boards and committees, including the teacher licensing boards of Montana and Hawaii, the Board of Directors of the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), and the Board of the American Association for Colleges of Teacher Education where he served a term as Chair. He was chair of the Unit Accreditation Board for NCATE and he chaired the Council for Accreditation of Education Professionals (CAEP) Commission as well as participating on CAEP's Board of Directors. After retiring from full-time work at Portland State University he was appointed to a Senior Fellow position with the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. In that role he has worked primarily with the iLEAD project dedicating his time to working with school/university partnerships to create and support educational leaders who can lead continuous improvement efforts to improve education for all students and redress longstanding educational inequities. Steve Tozer is professor emeritus and past university scholar in educational policy studies at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), where he was founding director of the UIC Center for Urban Education Leadership. Steve previously chaired the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; the Department of Educational Policy Studies at UIC; the Governor's Council on Educator Quality in Illinois; and a State Legislative Task Force that resulted in a new state school leader certificate. His collaborations with colleagues from UIC and Chicago Public Schools were continuously funded for eighteen years by the U.S. Department of Education and numerous foundations. He is lead author of a textbook, School and Society: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, 8th Edition (McGraw-Hill, 2020), and lead editor of The Handbook of Research in Social Foundations of Education (Routledge, 2011). Steve is a fellow of the George W. Bush Institute and currently works with Chicago Public Schools and other districts on research-practice partnerships for continuous improvement of school leadership.
Foreword
Anthony Bryk
Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships
Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work
"It Takes a Village" to Redress Inequities
The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network
Social Learning Theory and Culture
Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships
Trading Zones and Boundary Objects
iLEAD's Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object
The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones
* Continuous Improvement
* Equity
* Coordination
* Capacity Building
Conclusion
References
Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local
Context
1 - Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation
and Practice
University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools
David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers
Partnership Context
* University of Virginia
* Chesterfield County Public Schools
An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges
The "Improvement Sandwich": Cooperation into Coordination
1. CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning
2. UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program
* Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure
Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration
3. Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS
* Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS
* Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA
Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
4. CCPS Lessons Learned
* From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning
5. UVA Lessons Learned
* A&S Faculty Collective Learning
6. Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies
7. Essential Lessons of Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
2 - A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and
Inquiry-Driven School Leadership
Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11
Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth
Leisy Stosich
Context
Problem
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
8. Development
9. Advanced Leadership Preparation
* Redesigning Fordham's EdD Program
* Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science
10. Leadership Development
* Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community
* Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team
Initiative
* Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
3 - Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement
Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction
George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools
Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire
Silva, and Paige Whitlock
Context
* EDLE Program at GMU
* FCPS
* FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD
* Joining Together as iLEAD Partners
Problems
* Stagnant Progress on School Improvement
* Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
* Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together
Making Improvement Science EDLE's Signature Pedagogy
* EDLE Faculty's Introduction to Improvement Science
* Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development
Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS
* Professional Development Opportunities
* School-Based Leadership Induction
* Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach
to School Improvement
* Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20
School Year
* Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year
* Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year
* Showcasing Our Joint Efforts
Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon
* Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science
* Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration
* Concluding Thoughts
* Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
4 - Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity
High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez
Context
* High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Problems
* Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention
* Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
11. Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement
* Root Cause Analysis
* Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles
* Sharing Learning
12. Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame
13. Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches
* Deficit Thinking
* Compliance Orientation
* Improving Coach Development
* Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity
* Induction Improvement Coach Summit
* Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning
* The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes
* Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement
Teachable Moments
14. How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging?
15. How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support
Equity?
16. How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts?
* How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common
Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings?
Questions for Discussion
References
Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an
Animating Force
5 -From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership
University of Maryland College Park and Prince George's County Public
Schools
Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza,
Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski
Context
17. Not Your Father's MOU
18. The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change
* A Change in Perspective
* PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change - the EdD in School System
Leadership
* UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii
* iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of
Improvement
* Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice
Problems
* A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the "Improvement" in the School
Improvement Process
* Leveraging the New Strategic Plan
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
19. Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and "Solution"
* The Partnership "Solution" to the Challenge of District Capacity
Building with SPPing
20. Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked
Improvement Communities
21. Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact
* Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing
* Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions
* Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice
Lessons Learned
* Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point
* Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for
Change
Teachable Moments
* You're Not Really Married if You Don't Have the Paper
* Adapt, Don't Abandon
* Shifts Happen
* Just Do Something
References
6 - Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies
Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District
Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile
The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea
Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation
22. Challenges for AESD
23. Changes and Vision at MLFTC
24. A Renewed Partnership
25. Serendipity and Early Models
26. Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting
* Residents
* Lead Teachers
* Site Lead
* Instructional Configurations
* Studying the Innovative Approach
Lessons Learned
* Invested and Involved Leadership
* Systems and Structures
* Challenges of Teams
* Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration
* Characteristics of Successful Teams
Conclusion
Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation
Questions for Discussion
References
7 - District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM
Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District
Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni
Harrington, and Brian Harvey
Context: Beginning the Partnership Work
The Achievement Gap Project
Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
* Building Capacity
* Spread and Scale Progress
OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice
27. Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
28. Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice
29. Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
30. UM-SOE Dean's Office Staff PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-Developmental Progression
* The "How" of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms)
* Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines
* Vision for the Future
* NCSUP Mission
Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
8 - Equity-Focused Improvement Science
Portland State University and Portland Public Schools
Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey
Key Leaders
* Professor of Practice Susan Carlile
* Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson
* Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey
Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership
* Portland State University
* Portland Public Schools
Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts
Networked Improvement Communities
* Partner Districts
* Newberg School District (NSD)
* Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District
The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools
Challenges and Solutions
Tools to Identify Next Steps
* Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level
* Progress (Strengths) at PPS
* Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS
* Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU
Contextual Complexities
Theory of Improvement
* Program Redesign
* Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support
* Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders
* PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
Conclusion
Questions for Discussion
References
Section III: Partnerships Ain't Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and
Long-Term Sustainability
9 - Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused,
Systems-level Improvement
University of Denver and Denver Public Schools
Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead
Context
Problem
District Context
Sustainable Improvement in the District
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
31. Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
32. Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
33. Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
Summary of Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Lesson 1: Be Clear About your "Why"-Your North Star Guides the Way
* Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership
Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination
* Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to
Increasing Equity in the System
* Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research
Plan
* Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still
Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change
Questions for Discussion
References
10 - Organizational Changes' Impacts on University-District Partnership
Development
University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina
Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry
Context
* University of South Carolina College of Education
* The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD
Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership
34. Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD's Developmental Progressions and the
Stage Model
* Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching, 2020)
* Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986)
35. Partnership Journey
* Improvement Work Begins
* Establishment of a Core Improvement Team
36. Organizational Progress: Partnership
37. Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP)
Challenges
* Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals
* Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities)
* Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions
* Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations
* Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership,
Leadership, and Active Commitment
* Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect
and Learn
Questions for Discussion
References
11 - Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable
Outcomes at Scale
University of Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools
Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah
Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul
Zavitkovsky
Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC's "Urban Mission"
* Chicago School Reform and State Legislation
* The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key
Components
* Impact of Program Design and Redesign
* "We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are"
Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story
* From MOU to Vendor Contract
* A Missing Objective?
* Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central
Office Personnel
* A Next Edge of Growth
Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program
Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative
* Vision, Systems, and Above All, People
* Our First Targeted Program Hire
* Building the Team
* Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners
* Creating "Boundary Objects"
* Next Edges of Growth
* Need for New Resources
How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years
across 9 CEOs?
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
1.Equity
2.Partnership
3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People
4.Continuous Improvement
Questions for Discussion
References
Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education
Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag
Tightly Tethered Mutuality
Attending to the How of Partnerships
The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships
Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action
Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for
Leadership and Continuous Improvement
References
References
Index
About the Contributors
Anthony Bryk
Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships
Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work
"It Takes a Village" to Redress Inequities
The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network
Social Learning Theory and Culture
Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships
Trading Zones and Boundary Objects
iLEAD's Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object
The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones
* Continuous Improvement
* Equity
* Coordination
* Capacity Building
Conclusion
References
Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local
Context
1 - Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation
and Practice
University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools
David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers
Partnership Context
* University of Virginia
* Chesterfield County Public Schools
An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges
The "Improvement Sandwich": Cooperation into Coordination
1. CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning
2. UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program
* Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure
Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration
3. Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS
* Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS
* Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA
Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
4. CCPS Lessons Learned
* From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning
5. UVA Lessons Learned
* A&S Faculty Collective Learning
6. Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies
7. Essential Lessons of Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
2 - A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and
Inquiry-Driven School Leadership
Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11
Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth
Leisy Stosich
Context
Problem
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
8. Development
9. Advanced Leadership Preparation
* Redesigning Fordham's EdD Program
* Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science
10. Leadership Development
* Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community
* Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team
Initiative
* Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
3 - Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement
Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction
George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools
Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire
Silva, and Paige Whitlock
Context
* EDLE Program at GMU
* FCPS
* FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD
* Joining Together as iLEAD Partners
Problems
* Stagnant Progress on School Improvement
* Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
* Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together
Making Improvement Science EDLE's Signature Pedagogy
* EDLE Faculty's Introduction to Improvement Science
* Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development
Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS
* Professional Development Opportunities
* School-Based Leadership Induction
* Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach
to School Improvement
* Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20
School Year
* Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year
* Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year
* Showcasing Our Joint Efforts
Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon
* Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science
* Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration
* Concluding Thoughts
* Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
4 - Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity
High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez
Context
* High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Problems
* Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention
* Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
11. Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement
* Root Cause Analysis
* Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles
* Sharing Learning
12. Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame
13. Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches
* Deficit Thinking
* Compliance Orientation
* Improving Coach Development
* Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity
* Induction Improvement Coach Summit
* Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning
* The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes
* Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement
Teachable Moments
14. How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging?
15. How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support
Equity?
16. How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts?
* How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common
Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings?
Questions for Discussion
References
Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an
Animating Force
5 -From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership
University of Maryland College Park and Prince George's County Public
Schools
Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza,
Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski
Context
17. Not Your Father's MOU
18. The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change
* A Change in Perspective
* PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change - the EdD in School System
Leadership
* UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii
* iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of
Improvement
* Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice
Problems
* A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the "Improvement" in the School
Improvement Process
* Leveraging the New Strategic Plan
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
19. Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and "Solution"
* The Partnership "Solution" to the Challenge of District Capacity
Building with SPPing
20. Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked
Improvement Communities
21. Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact
* Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing
* Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions
* Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice
Lessons Learned
* Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point
* Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for
Change
Teachable Moments
* You're Not Really Married if You Don't Have the Paper
* Adapt, Don't Abandon
* Shifts Happen
* Just Do Something
References
6 - Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies
Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District
Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile
The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea
Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation
22. Challenges for AESD
23. Changes and Vision at MLFTC
24. A Renewed Partnership
25. Serendipity and Early Models
26. Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting
* Residents
* Lead Teachers
* Site Lead
* Instructional Configurations
* Studying the Innovative Approach
Lessons Learned
* Invested and Involved Leadership
* Systems and Structures
* Challenges of Teams
* Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration
* Characteristics of Successful Teams
Conclusion
Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation
Questions for Discussion
References
7 - District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM
Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District
Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni
Harrington, and Brian Harvey
Context: Beginning the Partnership Work
The Achievement Gap Project
Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
* Building Capacity
* Spread and Scale Progress
OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice
27. Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
28. Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice
29. Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
30. UM-SOE Dean's Office Staff PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-Developmental Progression
* The "How" of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms)
* Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines
* Vision for the Future
* NCSUP Mission
Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
8 - Equity-Focused Improvement Science
Portland State University and Portland Public Schools
Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey
Key Leaders
* Professor of Practice Susan Carlile
* Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson
* Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey
Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership
* Portland State University
* Portland Public Schools
Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts
Networked Improvement Communities
* Partner Districts
* Newberg School District (NSD)
* Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District
The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools
Challenges and Solutions
Tools to Identify Next Steps
* Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level
* Progress (Strengths) at PPS
* Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS
* Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU
Contextual Complexities
Theory of Improvement
* Program Redesign
* Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support
* Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders
* PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
Conclusion
Questions for Discussion
References
Section III: Partnerships Ain't Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and
Long-Term Sustainability
9 - Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused,
Systems-level Improvement
University of Denver and Denver Public Schools
Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead
Context
Problem
District Context
Sustainable Improvement in the District
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
31. Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
32. Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
33. Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
Summary of Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Lesson 1: Be Clear About your "Why"-Your North Star Guides the Way
* Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership
Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination
* Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to
Increasing Equity in the System
* Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research
Plan
* Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still
Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change
Questions for Discussion
References
10 - Organizational Changes' Impacts on University-District Partnership
Development
University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina
Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry
Context
* University of South Carolina College of Education
* The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD
Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership
34. Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD's Developmental Progressions and the
Stage Model
* Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching, 2020)
* Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986)
35. Partnership Journey
* Improvement Work Begins
* Establishment of a Core Improvement Team
36. Organizational Progress: Partnership
37. Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP)
Challenges
* Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals
* Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities)
* Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions
* Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations
* Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership,
Leadership, and Active Commitment
* Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect
and Learn
Questions for Discussion
References
11 - Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable
Outcomes at Scale
University of Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools
Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah
Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul
Zavitkovsky
Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC's "Urban Mission"
* Chicago School Reform and State Legislation
* The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key
Components
* Impact of Program Design and Redesign
* "We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are"
Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story
* From MOU to Vendor Contract
* A Missing Objective?
* Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central
Office Personnel
* A Next Edge of Growth
Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program
Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative
* Vision, Systems, and Above All, People
* Our First Targeted Program Hire
* Building the Team
* Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners
* Creating "Boundary Objects"
* Next Edges of Growth
* Need for New Resources
How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years
across 9 CEOs?
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
1.Equity
2.Partnership
3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People
4.Continuous Improvement
Questions for Discussion
References
Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education
Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag
Tightly Tethered Mutuality
Attending to the How of Partnerships
The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships
Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action
Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for
Leadership and Continuous Improvement
References
References
Index
About the Contributors
Foreword
Anthony Bryk
Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships
Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work
"It Takes a Village" to Redress Inequities
The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network
Social Learning Theory and Culture
Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships
Trading Zones and Boundary Objects
iLEAD's Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object
The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones
* Continuous Improvement
* Equity
* Coordination
* Capacity Building
Conclusion
References
Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local
Context
1 - Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation
and Practice
University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools
David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers
Partnership Context
* University of Virginia
* Chesterfield County Public Schools
An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges
The "Improvement Sandwich": Cooperation into Coordination
1. CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning
2. UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program
* Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure
Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration
3. Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS
* Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS
* Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA
Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
4. CCPS Lessons Learned
* From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning
5. UVA Lessons Learned
* A&S Faculty Collective Learning
6. Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies
7. Essential Lessons of Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
2 - A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and
Inquiry-Driven School Leadership
Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11
Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth
Leisy Stosich
Context
Problem
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
8. Development
9. Advanced Leadership Preparation
* Redesigning Fordham's EdD Program
* Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science
10. Leadership Development
* Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community
* Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team
Initiative
* Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
3 - Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement
Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction
George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools
Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire
Silva, and Paige Whitlock
Context
* EDLE Program at GMU
* FCPS
* FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD
* Joining Together as iLEAD Partners
Problems
* Stagnant Progress on School Improvement
* Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
* Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together
Making Improvement Science EDLE's Signature Pedagogy
* EDLE Faculty's Introduction to Improvement Science
* Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development
Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS
* Professional Development Opportunities
* School-Based Leadership Induction
* Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach
to School Improvement
* Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20
School Year
* Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year
* Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year
* Showcasing Our Joint Efforts
Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon
* Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science
* Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration
* Concluding Thoughts
* Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
4 - Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity
High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez
Context
* High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Problems
* Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention
* Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
11. Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement
* Root Cause Analysis
* Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles
* Sharing Learning
12. Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame
13. Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches
* Deficit Thinking
* Compliance Orientation
* Improving Coach Development
* Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity
* Induction Improvement Coach Summit
* Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning
* The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes
* Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement
Teachable Moments
14. How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging?
15. How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support
Equity?
16. How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts?
* How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common
Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings?
Questions for Discussion
References
Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an
Animating Force
5 -From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership
University of Maryland College Park and Prince George's County Public
Schools
Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza,
Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski
Context
17. Not Your Father's MOU
18. The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change
* A Change in Perspective
* PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change - the EdD in School System
Leadership
* UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii
* iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of
Improvement
* Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice
Problems
* A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the "Improvement" in the School
Improvement Process
* Leveraging the New Strategic Plan
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
19. Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and "Solution"
* The Partnership "Solution" to the Challenge of District Capacity
Building with SPPing
20. Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked
Improvement Communities
21. Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact
* Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing
* Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions
* Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice
Lessons Learned
* Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point
* Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for
Change
Teachable Moments
* You're Not Really Married if You Don't Have the Paper
* Adapt, Don't Abandon
* Shifts Happen
* Just Do Something
References
6 - Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies
Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District
Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile
The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea
Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation
22. Challenges for AESD
23. Changes and Vision at MLFTC
24. A Renewed Partnership
25. Serendipity and Early Models
26. Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting
* Residents
* Lead Teachers
* Site Lead
* Instructional Configurations
* Studying the Innovative Approach
Lessons Learned
* Invested and Involved Leadership
* Systems and Structures
* Challenges of Teams
* Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration
* Characteristics of Successful Teams
Conclusion
Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation
Questions for Discussion
References
7 - District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM
Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District
Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni
Harrington, and Brian Harvey
Context: Beginning the Partnership Work
The Achievement Gap Project
Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
* Building Capacity
* Spread and Scale Progress
OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice
27. Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
28. Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice
29. Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
30. UM-SOE Dean's Office Staff PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-Developmental Progression
* The "How" of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms)
* Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines
* Vision for the Future
* NCSUP Mission
Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
8 - Equity-Focused Improvement Science
Portland State University and Portland Public Schools
Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey
Key Leaders
* Professor of Practice Susan Carlile
* Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson
* Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey
Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership
* Portland State University
* Portland Public Schools
Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts
Networked Improvement Communities
* Partner Districts
* Newberg School District (NSD)
* Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District
The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools
Challenges and Solutions
Tools to Identify Next Steps
* Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level
* Progress (Strengths) at PPS
* Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS
* Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU
Contextual Complexities
Theory of Improvement
* Program Redesign
* Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support
* Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders
* PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
Conclusion
Questions for Discussion
References
Section III: Partnerships Ain't Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and
Long-Term Sustainability
9 - Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused,
Systems-level Improvement
University of Denver and Denver Public Schools
Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead
Context
Problem
District Context
Sustainable Improvement in the District
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
31. Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
32. Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
33. Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
Summary of Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Lesson 1: Be Clear About your "Why"-Your North Star Guides the Way
* Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership
Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination
* Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to
Increasing Equity in the System
* Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research
Plan
* Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still
Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change
Questions for Discussion
References
10 - Organizational Changes' Impacts on University-District Partnership
Development
University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina
Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry
Context
* University of South Carolina College of Education
* The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD
Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership
34. Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD's Developmental Progressions and the
Stage Model
* Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching, 2020)
* Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986)
35. Partnership Journey
* Improvement Work Begins
* Establishment of a Core Improvement Team
36. Organizational Progress: Partnership
37. Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP)
Challenges
* Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals
* Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities)
* Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions
* Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations
* Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership,
Leadership, and Active Commitment
* Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect
and Learn
Questions for Discussion
References
11 - Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable
Outcomes at Scale
University of Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools
Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah
Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul
Zavitkovsky
Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC's "Urban Mission"
* Chicago School Reform and State Legislation
* The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key
Components
* Impact of Program Design and Redesign
* "We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are"
Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story
* From MOU to Vendor Contract
* A Missing Objective?
* Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central
Office Personnel
* A Next Edge of Growth
Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program
Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative
* Vision, Systems, and Above All, People
* Our First Targeted Program Hire
* Building the Team
* Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners
* Creating "Boundary Objects"
* Next Edges of Growth
* Need for New Resources
How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years
across 9 CEOs?
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
1.Equity
2.Partnership
3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People
4.Continuous Improvement
Questions for Discussion
References
Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education
Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag
Tightly Tethered Mutuality
Attending to the How of Partnerships
The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships
Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action
Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for
Leadership and Continuous Improvement
References
References
Index
About the Contributors
Anthony Bryk
Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships
Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work
"It Takes a Village" to Redress Inequities
The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network
Social Learning Theory and Culture
Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships
Trading Zones and Boundary Objects
iLEAD's Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object
The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones
* Continuous Improvement
* Equity
* Coordination
* Capacity Building
Conclusion
References
Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local
Context
1 - Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation
and Practice
University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools
David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers
Partnership Context
* University of Virginia
* Chesterfield County Public Schools
An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges
The "Improvement Sandwich": Cooperation into Coordination
1. CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning
2. UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program
* Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure
Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration
3. Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS
* Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS
* Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA
Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
4. CCPS Lessons Learned
* From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning
5. UVA Lessons Learned
* A&S Faculty Collective Learning
6. Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies
7. Essential Lessons of Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
2 - A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and
Inquiry-Driven School Leadership
Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11
Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth
Leisy Stosich
Context
Problem
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
8. Development
9. Advanced Leadership Preparation
* Redesigning Fordham's EdD Program
* Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science
10. Leadership Development
* Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community
* Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team
Initiative
* Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
3 - Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement
Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction
George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools
Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire
Silva, and Paige Whitlock
Context
* EDLE Program at GMU
* FCPS
* FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD
* Joining Together as iLEAD Partners
Problems
* Stagnant Progress on School Improvement
* Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
* Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together
Making Improvement Science EDLE's Signature Pedagogy
* EDLE Faculty's Introduction to Improvement Science
* Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development
Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS
* Professional Development Opportunities
* School-Based Leadership Induction
* Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach
to School Improvement
* Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20
School Year
* Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year
* Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year
* Showcasing Our Joint Efforts
Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon
* Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science
* Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration
* Concluding Thoughts
* Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work
Questions for Discussion
References
4 - Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity
High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez
Context
* High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education
Problems
* Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention
* Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction
Challenges, Solutions and Evidence
11. Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement
* Root Cause Analysis
* Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles
* Sharing Learning
12. Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame
13. Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches
* Deficit Thinking
* Compliance Orientation
* Improving Coach Development
* Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity
* Induction Improvement Coach Summit
* Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning
* The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes
* Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement
Teachable Moments
14. How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging?
15. How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support
Equity?
16. How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts?
* How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common
Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings?
Questions for Discussion
References
Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an
Animating Force
5 -From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership
University of Maryland College Park and Prince George's County Public
Schools
Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza,
Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski
Context
17. Not Your Father's MOU
18. The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change
* A Change in Perspective
* PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change - the EdD in School System
Leadership
* UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii
* iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of
Improvement
* Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice
Problems
* A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the "Improvement" in the School
Improvement Process
* Leveraging the New Strategic Plan
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
19. Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and "Solution"
* The Partnership "Solution" to the Challenge of District Capacity
Building with SPPing
20. Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked
Improvement Communities
21. Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact
* Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing
* Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions
* Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice
Lessons Learned
* Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point
* Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for
Change
Teachable Moments
* You're Not Really Married if You Don't Have the Paper
* Adapt, Don't Abandon
* Shifts Happen
* Just Do Something
References
6 - Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies
Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District
Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile
The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea
Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation
22. Challenges for AESD
23. Changes and Vision at MLFTC
24. A Renewed Partnership
25. Serendipity and Early Models
26. Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting
* Residents
* Lead Teachers
* Site Lead
* Instructional Configurations
* Studying the Innovative Approach
Lessons Learned
* Invested and Involved Leadership
* Systems and Structures
* Challenges of Teams
* Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration
* Characteristics of Successful Teams
Conclusion
Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation
Questions for Discussion
References
7 - District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM
Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District
Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni
Harrington, and Brian Harvey
Context: Beginning the Partnership Work
The Achievement Gap Project
Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
* Building Capacity
* Spread and Scale Progress
OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice
27. Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
28. Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice
29. Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
30. UM-SOE Dean's Office Staff PDSA Cycle
* Plan
* Do
* Study
* Act
UM-Developmental Progression
* The "How" of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms)
* Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines
* Vision for the Future
* NCSUP Mission
Lessons Learned
Questions for Discussion
References
8 - Equity-Focused Improvement Science
Portland State University and Portland Public Schools
Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey
Key Leaders
* Professor of Practice Susan Carlile
* Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson
* Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey
Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership
* Portland State University
* Portland Public Schools
Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts
Networked Improvement Communities
* Partner Districts
* Newberg School District (NSD)
* Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District
The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools
Challenges and Solutions
Tools to Identify Next Steps
* Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level
* Progress (Strengths) at PPS
* Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level
* Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS
* Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU
Contextual Complexities
Theory of Improvement
* Program Redesign
* Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support
* Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders
* PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
Conclusion
Questions for Discussion
References
Section III: Partnerships Ain't Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and
Long-Term Sustainability
9 - Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused,
Systems-level Improvement
University of Denver and Denver Public Schools
Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead
Context
Problem
District Context
Sustainable Improvement in the District
Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence
31. Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
32. Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
33. Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership
* Where Did We Start?
* What Steps Happened Along the Way?
* Where Are We Now?
Summary of Impact
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Lesson 1: Be Clear About your "Why"-Your North Star Guides the Way
* Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership
Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination
* Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to
Increasing Equity in the System
* Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research
Plan
* Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still
Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change
Questions for Discussion
References
10 - Organizational Changes' Impacts on University-District Partnership
Development
University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina
Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry
Context
* University of South Carolina College of Education
* The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD
Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership
34. Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD's Developmental Progressions and the
Stage Model
* Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching, 2020)
* Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986)
35. Partnership Journey
* Improvement Work Begins
* Establishment of a Core Improvement Team
36. Organizational Progress: Partnership
37. Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP)
Challenges
* Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals
* Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities)
* Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions
* Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
* Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations
* Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership,
Leadership, and Active Commitment
* Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect
and Learn
Questions for Discussion
References
11 - Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable
Outcomes at Scale
University of Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools
Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah
Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul
Zavitkovsky
Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC's "Urban Mission"
* Chicago School Reform and State Legislation
* The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key
Components
* Impact of Program Design and Redesign
* "We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are"
Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story
* From MOU to Vendor Contract
* A Missing Objective?
* Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central
Office Personnel
* A Next Edge of Growth
Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program
Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative
* Vision, Systems, and Above All, People
* Our First Targeted Program Hire
* Building the Team
* Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners
* Creating "Boundary Objects"
* Next Edges of Growth
* Need for New Resources
How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years
across 9 CEOs?
Conclusions and Lessons Learned
1.Equity
2.Partnership
3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People
4.Continuous Improvement
Questions for Discussion
References
Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education
Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag
Tightly Tethered Mutuality
Attending to the How of Partnerships
The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships
Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action
Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for
Leadership and Continuous Improvement
References
References
Index
About the Contributors