Improving America's Schools Together

How District-University Partnerships and Continuous Improvement Can Transform Education
Herausgeber: Biag, Manuelito; Imig, David G.; Gomez, Louis M.

• Broschiertes Buch

Produktbeschreibung

The first definitive text on continuous improvement in school district-university partnerships, covering improvement methods, theory, research, and real cases across the country with practical improvement tools that can be adapted to any setting.

---

Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: RLPG/Galleys
• Seitenzahl: 382
• Erscheinungstermin: 25. Mai 2023
• Englisch
• Abmessung: 254mm x 178mm x 21mm
• Gewicht: 717g
• ISBN-13: 9781538173220
• ISBN-10: 1538173220
• Artikelnr.: 66873821

Autorenporträt

Edited by Louis M. Gomez; Manuelito Biag; David G. Imig; Randy Hitz and Steve Tozer - Foreword by Anthony S. Bryk

Inhaltsangabe

Foreword Anthony Bryk Introduction: Getting to Mutual-Benefit Partnerships Navigating the Tangles of Inter-Organizational Work
It Takes a Village
to Redress Inequities The Improvement Leadership Education and Development (iLEAD) Network Social Learning Theory and Culture Moving Beyond Transactional Relationships Trading Zones and Boundary Objects iLEAD
s Developmental Progressions Framework as a Boundary Object The Desiderata to Sustain Trading Zones * Continuous Improvement * Equity * Coordination * Capacity Building Conclusion References Section I: Improvement Methods, Equity, and Problems of Practice in Local Context 1
Braiding Improvement into the Fabric of District Leadership Preparation and Practice University of Virginia and Chesterfield County Public Schools David Eddy-Spicer, Tinkhani White, and Michelle Beavers Partnership Context * University of Virginia * Chesterfield County Public Schools An Educational Leadership Preparation Partnership Emerges The
Improvement Sandwich
: Cooperation into Coordination 1. CCPS Strand: Focus on Programmatic Equity and School Improvement Planning 2. UVA Strand: Redesigning the M.Ed. Program * Field-Based Learning as Boundary Infrastructure Securing the Braid: Coordination into Collaboration 3. Deepening Coordination Across School Levels and With Central Office in CCPS * Collaborating across School Levels in CCPS * Collaboration in Teaching and Learning at UVA Results: Organizational Practice & Partnership Conclusions and Lessons Learned 4. CCPS Lessons Learned * From Professional Development to Intrapreneurial Collective Learning 5. UVA Lessons Learned * A&S Faculty Collective Learning 6. Partnership Lessons Learned: Co-Development of Leadership Pedagogies 7. Essential Lessons of Partnership Work Questions for Discussion References 2
A University-School District Collaboration to Improve Equity- and Inquiry-Driven School Leadership Fordham University and Bronx School Districts 9 & 11 Margaret Terry Orr, Kris DeFilippis, Meisha Ross Porter, and Elizabeth Leisy Stosich Context Problem Challenges, Solutions and Evidence 8. Development 9. Advanced Leadership Preparation * Redesigning Fordham
s EdD Program * Creating a Bronx EdD Cohort in Equity-Focused Improvement Science 10. Leadership Development * Assistant Principal Math Networked Improvement Community * Creating Positive Change through the Bronx Academic Response Team Initiative * Principal Equity Improvement Networked Improvement Communities Conclusions and Lessons Learned Questions for Discussion References 3
Moving a Partnership from Itinerant to Integral: Using Improvement Science as a Catalyst for Change in Leadership Preparation & Induction George Mason University and Fairfax County Public Schools Samantha Viano, Farnoosh Shahrokhi, Regina Biggs, Natasha Saunders, Claire Silva, and Paige Whitlock Context * EDLE Program at GMU * FCPS * FCPS and GMU Partnering Prior to iLEAD * Joining Together as iLEAD Partners Problems * Stagnant Progress on School Improvement * Mismatch Between EDLE Leadership Preparation and FCPS Practice Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence * Improvement Science as Our Catalyzing Agent to Come Together Making Improvement Science EDLE
s Signature Pedagogy * EDLE Faculty
s Introduction to Improvement Science * Commitment to Improvement Science through Curriculum Development Diverse Approaches to Supporting the Use of Improvement Science in FCPS * Professional Development Opportunities * School-Based Leadership Induction * Title I Comprehensive Needs Assessment Our Partnership Driven Initiative: Piloting an Improvement Science Approach to School Improvement * Phase 1: Cultivating Cultures of Continuous Improvement, 2019-20 School Year * Phase 2: Redressing Inequities, 2020-21 School Year * Phase 3: Spreading What Works, 2021-22 School Year * Showcasing Our Joint Efforts Synergy between Leadership Preparation and School Improvement Conclusions and Lessons Learned * Starting with a Foundational Relationship to Build upon * Garner Immediate Excitement about Improvement Science * Leverage Eagerness and Capacity to Make Time for Collaboration * Concluding Thoughts * Attending to the Mission of our Partnership Work Questions for Discussion References 4
Improvement Science as a Collaborative Effort for Equity High Tech High and High Tech High Graduate School of Education Julia Jacobsen and Diana Cornejo-Sanchez Context * High Tech High & the High Tech High Graduate School of Education Problems * Induction as a Lever for Teacher Retention * Experimenting with Improvement in Teacher Induction Challenges, Solutions and Evidence 11. Challenge #1: Entry Planning that Incorporates Continuous Improvement * Root Cause Analysis * Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles * Sharing Learning 12. Challenge #2: Operating in a One-Year Time Frame 13. Challenge #3: Developing the Capacity of Improvement Coaches * Deficit Thinking * Compliance Orientation * Improving Coach Development * Facilitating Continuous Improvement for Equity * Induction Improvement Coach Summit * Impact Conclusions and Lessons Learned * CI Can Be an Effective Framework for Adaptive Learning * The Importance of Improvement Science in our own Program Processes * Developing New Organizational Capacity for Continuous Improvement Teachable Moments 14. How Might Improvement Processes Foster Connection and Belonging? 15. How Can Both the Process and the Outcome of Improvement Efforts Support Equity? 16. How Can We Develop Sustainable Improvement Efforts? * How Can Improvement Science Help Organizations Grow Toward a Common Mission and Develop Concrete Understandings? Questions for Discussion References Section II: A New Kind of Partnership: Continuous Improvement as an Animating Force 5
From a Transactional Relationship to a Transformational Partnership University of Maryland College Park and Prince George
s County Public Schools Segun Eubanks, Jean Snell, Doug Anthony, Charoscar Coleman, Felice Desouza, Kara Miley-Libby, and Christine M. Neumerski Context 17. Not Your Father
s MOU 18. The Back Story: People Building Trust, Institutions Leading Change * A Change in Perspective * PGCPS Initiates a Catalyst for Change
the EdD in School System Leadership * UMD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: The Ceii * iLEAD Initiates a Catalyst for Change: Getting to the Work of Improvement * Getting to Work: Our First Problem of Practice Problems * A Shared Problem of Practice: Putting the
Improvement
in the School Improvement Process * Leveraging the New Strategic Plan Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence 19. Improvement Science as a Shared Methodology and
Solution
* The Partnership
Solution
to the Challenge of District Capacity Building with SPPing 20. Looking Forward to Future Work: The Launch of 2 Partnership Networked Improvement Communities 21. Showing Evidence of Partnership Impact * Evidence of Engagement and Commitment is Strong and Growing * Growth on the iLEAD Developmental Progressions * Emerging Data of Change in Systems Practice Lessons Learned * Key Learning #1: Building Strong Relationships is the Starting Point * Key Learning #2: Focus on Problems of Practice and Stay Prepared for Change Teachable Moments * You're Not Really Married if You Don
t Have the Paper * Adapt, Don
t Abandon * Shifts Happen * Just Do Something References 6
Redesigning School Staffing Models through Team-Based Residencies Arizona State University and Avondale Elementary School District Betsy Hargrove, Christina Flesher, Nicole L. Thompson, and Carole Basile The Next Education Workforce: A Growing Idea Context: MLFTC and AESD Partnership Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence Based Teacher Preparation 22. Challenges for AESD 23. Changes and Vision at MLFTC 24. A Renewed Partnership 25. Serendipity and Early Models 26. Improvement Science: Planning, Doing, Studying Acting * Residents * Lead Teachers * Site Lead * Instructional Configurations * Studying the Innovative Approach Lessons Learned * Invested and Involved Leadership * Systems and Structures * Challenges of Teams * Developmental Progressions and Growth in Collaboration * Characteristics of Successful Teams Conclusion Afterword: Beyond Teacher Preparation Questions for Discussion References 7
District-University Partnerships for Continuous Improvement: How Can UM Help? University of Mississippi and Oxford School District Denise A. Soares, Mark E. Deschaine, W. Bradley Roberson, David Rock, Marni Harrington, and Brian Harvey Context: Beginning the Partnership Work The Achievement Gap Project Chronic Absenteeism PDSA Cycle * Plan * Do * Study * Act * Building Capacity * Spread and Scale Progress OSD Improvement Science Problems of Practice 27. Passion Professional Development PDSA Cycle * Plan * Do * Study * Act 28. Youth Truth Survey PDSA Cycle * Plan * Do * Study * Act UM-SOE Improvement Science Problems of Practice 29. Graduate Studies Office PDSA Cycle * Plan * Do * Study * Act 30. UM-SOE Dean
s Office Staff PDSA Cycle * Plan * Do * Study * Act UM-Developmental Progression * The
How
of Partnerships (Partnership Mechanisms) * Expectations, Sustainability, Norms & Routines * Vision for the Future * NCSUP Mission Lessons Learned Questions for Discussion References 8
Equity-Focused Improvement Science Portland State University and Portland Public Schools Susan P. Carlile, Deborah S. Peterson, and Tania McKey Key Leaders * Professor of Practice Susan Carlile * Associate Professor Emerita Dr. Deborah S. Peterson * Assistant Professor and Senior Director of Humanities Dr. Tania McKey Context of the PSU-PPS Partnership * Portland State University * Portland Public Schools Chronology of Improvement Science Efforts Networked Improvement Communities * Partner Districts * Newberg School District (NSD) * Changes in the Partnership with the Newberg School District The New District Partnership: Portland Public Schools Challenges and Solutions Tools to Identify Next Steps * Progress (Strengths) at the Partnership Level * Progress (Strengths) at PPS * Progress (Strengths) at the PSU Level * Areas of Focus (Challenges) at the Partnership Level * Areas of Focus (Challenges) in PPS * Area of Focus (Challenge) in PSU Contextual Complexities Theory of Improvement * Program Redesign * Redesign PPS Practices for Principal Support * Hire Scholarly Practitioners as Principal Preparation Cohort Leaders * PPS Hires PSU Principal Licensure Completers Lessons Learned Next Steps Conclusion Questions for Discussion References Section III: Partnerships Ain
t Easy: Learning from Short-Term Efforts and Long-Term Sustainability 9
Shared Goals, Methods, and Learning: Partnering for Equity-focused, Systems-level Improvement University of Denver and Denver Public Schools Erin Anderson and Sandra Lochhead Context Problem District Context Sustainable Improvement in the District Challenges, Solutions, and Evidence 31. Shared Goals: Embedded Process Over External Program * Where Did We Start? * What Steps Happened Along the Way? * Where Are We Now? 32. Shared Methodology: The Design Improvement for Equity (DI4E) Model * Where Did We Start? * What Steps Happened Along the Way? * Where Are We Now? 33. Shared Learning: Shared Research Agenda in a Research-Practice Partnership * Where Did We Start? * What Steps Happened Along the Way? * Where Are We Now? Summary of Impact Conclusions and Lessons Learned * Lesson 1: Be Clear About your
Why
Your North Star Guides the Way * Lesson 2: Create a Shared Theory of Improvement for your Partnership Work and Use It as a Map to Reach your Destination * Lesson 3: Interdependence Was Essential to the Partnership and to Increasing Equity in the System * Lesson 4: Be Disciplined about a Shared Learning Agenda or Research Plan * Lesson 5: Despite Shared Values, Norms, and Goals, There Are Still Organizational Values and Conditions That Will Limit Systems Change Questions for Discussion References 10
Organizational Changes
Impacts on University-District Partnership Development University of South Carolina and K-12 School District in South Carolina Kathleen M. W. Cunningham, Peter Moyi, and Barnett Berry Context * University of South Carolina College of Education * The Partnership Between CoE/EDLP and MCSD Developing and Sustaining a District-University Partnership 34. Two Partnership Frameworks: iLEAD
s Developmental Progressions and the Stage Model * Developmental Progressions (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2020) * Stage Model (Trubowitz, 1986) 35. Partnership Journey * Improvement Work Begins * Establishment of a Core Improvement Team 36. Organizational Progress: Partnership 37. Organizational Progress: UofSC (i.e., CoE and EDLP) Challenges * Challenge 1: Multiple, Evolving Goals * Challenge 2: Logistics (Distance, Funding, Time-Competing Priorities) * Challenge 3: Personnel and Leadership Transitions * Challenge 4: COVID-19 Pandemic Conclusions and Lessons Learned * Consideration 1: Clearly Defined Goals and Expectations * Consideration 2: Core Partnership Team with Consistent Membership, Leadership, and Active Commitment * Consideration 3: Lean on a Continuous Improvement Mindset to Reflect and Learn Questions for Discussion References 11
Preparing Principals for Urban Schools: The Challenge of Equitable Outcomes at Scale University of Illinois Chicago and Chicago Public Schools Steve Tozer, Peter Martinez, Cynthia K. Barron, Shelby Cosner, Zipporah Hightower, Janice Jackson, David Mayrowetz, Sam Whalen, and Paul Zavitkovsky Partnership Context: Chicago school reform and UIC
s
Urban Mission
* Chicago School Reform and State Legislation * The Principal Preparation Program Design and Redesign: 11 Key Components * Impact of Program Design and Redesign *
We Want to Be as Good as People Think We Are
Using the Development Progressions to Tell the CPS/UIC Partnership Story * From MOU to Vendor Contract * A Missing Objective? * Preparation of CPS Principal Supervisors (Network Chiefs) and Central Office Personnel * A Next Edge of Growth Developing Capacity as a District Partner: the UIC Ed.D. Program Elaborations and Qualifications on the IHE Narrative * Vision, Systems, and Above All, People * Our First Targeted Program Hire * Building the Team * Leadership Coaches as Boundary Spanners * Creating
Boundary Objects
* Next Edges of Growth * Need for New Resources How Did the District Sustain its Share of the Partnership for 20 Years across 9 CEOs? Conclusions and Lessons Learned 1.Equity 2.Partnership 3.Leadership Development: Vision, Systems, and People 4.Continuous Improvement Questions for Discussion References Conclusion: How Continuous Improvement Partnerships Can Transform Education Louis Gomez and Manuelito Biag Tightly Tethered Mutuality Attending to the How of Partnerships The Role of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Building a Strong Field: Infrastructure that Recasts Partnerships Creating Social Infrastructure for Collective Action Looking Forward: The Sustainability of Mutually Beneficial Partnerships for Leadership and Continuous Improvement References References Index About the Contributors