Few arguments in biomedical experimentation have stirred such heated debate in recent years as those raised by animal research. In this comprehensive analysis of the social, political, and ethical conflicts surrounding the use of animals in scientific experiments, Barbara Orlans judges both ends of the spectrum in this debate -- unconditional approval or rejection of animal experimentation -- to be untenable. Instead of arguing for either view, she thoughtfully explores the ground between the extremes, and convincingly makes the case for public policy reforms that serve to improve the welfare of laboratory animals without jeopardizing scientific endeavor. This book presents controversial issues in a balanced manner based on careful historical analysis and original research. Different mechanisms of oversight for animal experiments are compared and those that have worked well are identified. This compelling work will be of interest to biomedical scientists, ethicists, animal welfare advocates and other readers concerned with this critical issue.
Review quote:
"The best informed book on the subject of animal experimentation that has been written for scientists..." Animal Welfare Institute Quarterly
This is a comprenhensive, up-to-date analysis of the major controversial issues surrounding the use of animals in research, testing, and education. The case is made for public policy reforms that improve the welfare of laboratory animals without jeopardizing scientific endeavour. The author attempts to bridge the gap in understanding between the biomedical community and their adversaries.
Review quote:
"The best informed book on the subject of animal experimentation that has been written for scientists..." Animal Welfare Institute Quarterly
This is a comprenhensive, up-to-date analysis of the major controversial issues surrounding the use of animals in research, testing, and education. The case is made for public policy reforms that improve the welfare of laboratory animals without jeopardizing scientific endeavour. The author attempts to bridge the gap in understanding between the biomedical community and their adversaries.