22,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
11 °P sammeln
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![From rights to the environment to rights for the environment]( "From rights to the environment to rights for the environment")
From rights to the environment to rights for the environment26,99 €![Jurisdiction]( "Jurisdiction")
Jurisdiction29,99 €![Criminal Jurisdiction]( "Criminal Jurisdiction")
Criminal Jurisdiction22,99 €![The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law]( "The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law")
The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law75,99 €![Arbitration and the Courts]( "Arbitration and the Courts")
Arbitration and the Courts18,99 €![The Kosovo Specialist Chambers The last resort for justice in Kosovo?]( "The Kosovo Specialist Chambers The last resort for justice in Kosovo?")
The Kosovo Specialist Chambers The last resort for justice in Kosovo?30,99 €![The ICC's jurisdiction and international immunities of heads of states]( "The ICC's jurisdiction and international immunities of heads of states")
The ICC's jurisdiction and international immunities of heads of states36,99 €
Inherent jurisdiction is a doctrine of the English common law that a superior court has the jurisdiction to hear any matter that comes before it, unless a statute or rule limit that authority or grants exclusive jurisdiction to some other court or tribunal. The term is also used when a governmental institution derives its jurisdiction from a fundamental governing instrument such as a constitution. In the English case of Bremer Vulkan Schiffbau und Maschinenfabrik v. South India Shipping Corporation Ltd, Lord Diplock described the court's inherent jurisdiction as a general power to control its own procedure so as to prevent its being used to achieve injustice. Inherent jurisdiction appears to apply to an almost limitless set of circumstances. There are four general categories for use of the court's inherent jurisdiction: to ensure convenience and fairness in legal proceedings; to prevent steps being taken that would render judicial proceedings inefficacious; to prevent abuses of process; to act in aid of superior courts and in aid or control of inferior courts and tribunals.