How should we think about the problems of privacy and free speech? Neil Richards argues that when privacy and free speech truly conflict, free speech should almost always win, but contends that, contrary to conventional wisdom, speech and privacy are only rarely in conflict.
How should we think about the problems of privacy and free speech? Neil Richards argues that when privacy and free speech truly conflict, free speech should almost always win, but contends that, contrary to conventional wisdom, speech and privacy are only rarely in conflict.Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Neil Richards is a Professor of Law at Washington University in St. Louis, where he teaches and writes about privacy, technology, and civil liberties. He was born in England and educated in the United States, where he earned a B.A. from George Washington University, and graduate degrees in law and history from the University of Virginia. Before becoming an academic, he practiced law in Washington, D.C., and served as a law clerk to William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction Part One: Tort Privacy 1. Tort Privacy 2. Speech 3. Disclosure 4. Invasion 5. Data Part Two: Intellectual Privacy 6. Intellectual Privacy 7. Thinking 8. Reading 9. Confiding Part Three: Information Policy and Civil Liberties 10. Beyond Tort Privacy 11. Beyond Law 12. Conclusion Acknowledgements